UK’s frac ban like Quebec’s and Germany’s? Twisted by definition?

Fracking moratorium doesn’t cover proppant squeeze – minister by Ruth Hayhurst, , Drill or Drop

The energy minister has confirmed that a small-scale form of fracking, planned for a site in Lincolnshire, is not covered by the moratorium on hydraulic fracturing.

In a written parliamentary answer, Anne-Marie Trevelyan said the moratorium, imposed in England on 2 November 2019, applied to fracking that met a definition based on how much fluid it used.

She was asked by the MP for Rother Valley, Alexander Stafford, whether it covered the process known as proppant squeeze.

This injects fluid and proppant into a rock formation to improve the flow of hydrocarbons. The Environment Agency (EA) regards it as a form of low-volume fracking because the injection pressure is high enough to fracture rocks.

The process is expected to be used by Egdon Resources to improve oil flows at its site at Wressle near Scunthorpe.

The minister said the moratorium applied to operations defined as associated hydraulic fracturing that required Hydraulic Fracturing Consent from the secretary of state for business, energy and industrial Strategy.

The definition, originally used by the European Union, was included in the 2015 Infrastructure Act and inserted in the Petroleum Act 1998. It comprises operations that use 1,000m3 of fluid per fracturing stage or 10,000m3 of fluid during the whole fracking process.

The minister said:

“Activities outside of this definition are not included in the moratorium.”

Alexander Stafford told DrillOrDrop he hoped the definition of associated hydraulic fracturing would be “tightened up even further”. I have learned too many times, painfully, that “hope” is useless against the frac industry and the politicians/regulators/courts/lawyers that enable its many betrayals and harms.

Proposals for the Wressle proppant squeeze indicate it will not meet the definition of associated hydraulic fracturing and will not need Hydraulic Fracturing Consent.

The environmental permit for the site said the operation would use 150m3 of gelled liquid and ceramic beads.

The Wressle proppant squeeze will, however, need an approved Hydraulic Fracturing Plan, which states how the fracking process will be controlled and monitored.

DrillOrDrop understands this is being considered by the Environment Agency (EA) and Oil & Gas Authority.

According to the EA the Wressle proppant squeeze will be the first time a proppant squeeze has been used in England on a deviated well under a town.


Deborah Gibson

It’s good to have this properly confirmed even if it’s unwelcome to hear. Next step: get this stopped too. Well done Mr Stafford for getting the ball rolling.


Why else would this government redefine hydraulic fracturing before it announced a moratorium? I expect industry “defines” and “redefines” frac’ing and directs gov’ts and regulators on what is allowed, how to undo frac bans, how to unravel reports warning of too many frac risks and harms, and con the public into believing they have a ban.

Refer to a few examples of the frac ban con in action (NGOs are guilty too at enabling frac’ing while calling for bans, especially in frac’d to hell Canada):

2012: Ontario won’t allow fracking for gas without evidence it’s safe: McGuinty Refer below to 2015!

2014: Quebec’s Premier Declares Province-wide Shale Gas Ban after Environmental Review Board (BAPE) says Fracking Not Worth The Risk, “Too many negative consequences to the environment and society…risks to air and water quality…noise and light pollution”

2014: Germany EPA Frac Report Released: Risks Associated with Fracing are Too High; “So far, no company has been able to present a sustainable waste management concept”

2015: Already 3,600 frac’d wells in Ontario !!!!

2015: Who do Caleb Behn and Council of Canadians represent? One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Call for Federal Fracking Regulation Flies in the Face of Call for a Ban

2015: Ontario Minister Natural Resources/Forestry Bill Mauro says “there are currently no applications before the Ministry requesting approval to…use high-volume hydraulic fracturing” but the Ministry hasn’t defined “high volume” so how would he know?

2015: More “Best in the World” frac backtrack: Germany to legalize fracking, including shallow

2016: Germany voted today to ban commercial fracking of unconventional resources, including CBM and shale gas, “until further notice.” Conventional fracking is allowed to continue.

2016: “A New Step Forward!” Quebec introduces draconian oil & gas bill to give companies more rights than property owners, Days later authorizes Petrolia Inc to frack Anticosti: “This resounding success on the regulatory front is essentially due to the work of Petrolia, accompanied by the experts at SNC-Lavalin….”

2016: Oil & Gas Industry’s Abusive “Alberta Model” Deregulation Crashes into Quebec: Liberals to force controversial energy bill (106) into law despite massive widespread protests

2016: The real reason for Quebec’s Frac Bill 106: Questerre Energy shares soar after Quebec passes Bill 106

2017: Bravo Brava Courage, Compassion, Community! Republic of Ireland Frack Ban Completes Final Stage: Seanad passes fracking ban! The Irish are too wise to be conned by twisted definitions and other dirty tricks.

2017: Compare Republic of Ireland’s Frac Ban with Germany’s Non Ban Frack Ban: Germany redefines fracking; “Conventional” fracking allowed!

2017: As expected, Alberta Oil & Gas Industry Corruption & Synergy Enacts its Evil into Quebec: Couillard Govt quietly releases 4 bills, Enables drilling & fracking in water ways and lakes, within 150 m of homes, 60 m of parks

2017: “Alberta Model” Quebec’s Frac Frenzy Free-for-all Deregulation Bill 106: Vue en coupe d’un règlement qui nous prend pour des idiots

2019: Magnificent article by Andrew Nikiforuk: UK Ban Adds to the Tremors Taking Down the Fracking Industry

This entry was posted in Global Frac News. Bookmark the permalink.