Dear CAPE, Stop enabling frac’ers! Calling again for yet more study (after decades and many hundreds of studies already) and regulation is synergy, which only aids frac’ers. No regulation or study can make frac’ing safe or return the massive volumes of water lost permanently from the hydrogeological cycle. Besides, companies just ignore laws and regulations, and regulators break laws and regulations letting them, *and* bully and abuse the frac-harmed, further aiding frac’ers.

Regulations only benefit frac’ers, corporate polluters and their enablers, like Pembina Institute, Council of Canadians, Sierra Club, CAPE, …

2012: AEA: Support to the identification of potential risks for the environment and human health arising from hydrocarbons operations involving hydraulic fracturing in Europe

A proportion (25% to 100%) of the water used in hydraulic fracturing is not recovered, and consequently this water is lost permanently to re-use, which differs from some other water uses in which water can be recovered and processed for re-use.

2014: Compendium of scientific, medical, and media findings demonstrating risks and harms of fracking (unconventional gas and oil extraction)

2020: A decade of science on frac harms – Compendium 7 released: “The data continue to reveal a plethora of recurring problems that cannot be sufficiently averted through regulatory frameworks” while regulators in Canada continue to DEregulate to enable the endless **known** harms. Canadian frac-harmed Vicky Simlik: “Because there is no such thing as a kind & gentle frac’ it needs to be banned period.”

2023: Frac Compendium 9: From 65 studies to “an avalanche” of nearly 2,500 showing evidence of harm from frac’ing. Dr. Sandra Steingraber: “Fracking resembles lead paint or indoor smoking — no rules or regulations can make these practices safe.”

2024: Justin Nobel’s book, Petroleum 238, on oil, gas ‘n frac industry’s radioactive waste secret now available: “More Radioactivity Than at Chernobyl.” Jesse Lombardi: “In every single oilfield you will find these oilfield waste treatment centers churning radioactive waste around like pancake mix”

The untold story of LNG’s impacts on healthcare in B.C., The expansion of BC’s liquefied natural gas industry is driving up healthcare system costs. If we value quality healthcare, it must end now by Melissa Lem with CAPE, August 28, 2024, Corporate Knights (also frac and LNG enablers)

Almost exactly a year ago, the worst wildfires in Canada’s recorded history were blazing across the country, causing the evacuation of 59,000 people in British Columbia, triggering a province-wide state of emergency and sending patients to emergency rooms with asthma exacerbations and heart attacks from wildfire smoke. This summer, however, the bigger story may be the emergency rooms themselves. Almost 200 ER closures have been announced in northern BC alone this year, depriving communities of life-saving care when they need it most.

Some healthcare leaders point to systemic underinvestment in primary care and pandemic-related burnout as key reasons for these widespread closures. While this is undoubtedly true, in some towns another major factor is at play. The expansion of B.C.’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry is fuelling impacts across the province that increase healthcare system costs and reduce access to care – and if we value high-quality healthcare, it must end now.

In B.C., almost all “natural” gas is extracted via a highly polluting and water-intensive technique called hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as “fracking,” to crack the earth open and access methane gas deposits. Research shows that fracking pollutes the land, water and air with chemicals linked to serious health risks, whether through flaring, gas leaks or leaks of fracking fluid. Comprehensive scientific reviews, including damning studies from Canada, have been published in recent years, overwhelmingly pointing to its myriad health harms, including associations with childhood leukemia, asthma, heart disease and poor pregnancy outcomes. Due to its environmental and health risks, fracking bans or moratoria are currently in place in four other provinces in Canada.

Unsurprisingly, stories I have been told by physicians who live in or have left the Peace Region, where the majority of fracking occurs, reflect this research. At least seven doctors have quietly closed their practices and moved their families away from Dawson Creek – where fracking is rampant – seeking healthier communities. Each one specifically cited their concerns about rare diseases, tumours and deadly cancers diagnosed in their own patients, colleagues, friends and family members, and a school system with low academic standards due to a boom-and-bust economy based on oil and gas.

In a town that typically requires at least 15 family physicians to provide primary care and staff the emergency department, this represents almost half the workforce. This compounds access-to-care issues due to already high turnover in internationally recruited staff, who leave for larger cities after their contracts are up. On account of their fears about social and professional risks should they speak out against the powerful oil and gas industry, most of them remain silent.

On a broader level, our healthcare system is also paying a steep price as the fossil fuel industry grows. Last year’s wildfires blanketed communities with smoke that incurred health costs in Ontario alone of $1.28 billion in only five days. In 2021, the Western Canada heat dome killed 619 people in B.C. – the worst weather-related mass casualty event in Canada’s history.

Meanwhile, 57 fossil fuel companies are releasing 80% of our carbon pollution, and two of the top-10 polluters, Shell and PetroChina, are partners in the $40-billion LNG Canada project in Kitimat. If we continue to approve new LNG infrastructure and fail to lower our emissions, climate change will cost the Canadian healthcare system an estimated additional $110 billion per year within the next 25 years.

Research also points to high social costs of the LNG industry. Though proponents emphasize the industry’s economic benefits, they are often overstated and unequally distributed. Influxes of workers can significantly worsen housing affordability, substance abuse, domestic violence and sexually transmitted infections. Broken connections to the land and between neighbours worsen mental health issues and residents’ sense of place and belonging. Mental illness already costs the B.C. economy more than $6 billion annually. Through harmful impacts on local communities, and by driving climate change that worsens the rising epidemic of eco-anxiety, the LNG industry in B.C. is contributing to significant social and mental health costs.

That is why, this month, more than 300 physicians and nurses signed an open letter calling on the provincial government to choose a healthier future, where its climate commitments are met and communities and health systems are protected.

Though the problem is vast, the solutions are many – and when they are enacted, our health and healthcare systems across B.C., and Canada, will be the benefactors.

Melissa Lem is a Vancouver family physician, president of the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment and a clinical assistant professor at the University of British Columbia.

Refer also to:

2023: Synergy Strikes Again! CAPE (BC doctors) & CANE (nurses) blame LNG and frac’ing for rampant wildfires and disease but do not call for a ban, instead they ask for a pause on new fracs to study harms that have already been studied (for years)!

2020: Here’s how synergy spin by CAPE is used: Get media to wrongly define hydraulic fracturing to keep industry happy & frac’ing, just like Sierra Club and Council of Canadians do. Straight reports: “Canadian doctors link” frac’d gas to health harms, but not one doctor wrote the report; the lead author is not even part of the doctors’ association

2020: Synergy Strikes Again! CAPE releases new report on frac’ing with great comment by Executive Director, lawyer Robin Edger: “Fracking threatens our health…. The only responsible step for government is to ban it outright.” But, his quote is not included in the report, which is drek (“peer” review by Encana-AER-OGC enabler Pembina Institute).

Slides above from Ernst presentations

This entry was posted in Global Frac News. Bookmark the permalink.