Carney’s new dirty deal (only 21 days for Canadians to comment) with relentless liar traitor Danielle Smith and her stupid Nazi-loving separatists and racist religious extremists in TBA, is one of the most monstrous things I’ve read since Herr Hideous USA-lover Harper was PM.
These bits are listed like this in one document; They contradict and are vile (Harper Hideous Racist fuckwad Carney working with racist asshat Nazi Smith to destroy UNDRIP across Canada):
AND WHEREAS Canada maintains its commitment to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP);
AND WHEREAS Alberta continues to act in a manner that is consistent with treaties, the Canadian Constitution, and Alberta law, and views UNDRIP as non-binding;
Yes, Mother Fucker Carney, why?
***
@reddyeddy.bsky.social:
That’s a weird way to write that 70 percent of Albertans are sane, 17 percent are stupid, and 4 percent are fucking stupid
@krushent.bsky.social:
I suspect Danielle Smith is one of the 4%.
@agnesbrowne.bsky.social:
Do the 4% need help filling out forms to immigrate to USA?
I am sure many of us would be happy to oblige the traitorous dummies if they take Smith and Poilievre with them.
Traitor Carney will never allow Pee Pee to leave Canada, or not lead the CPCs – Carney and his rich kid rapist pals need Pee Pee to keep Carney in power. They are a tight team, along with Anti Democracy IDU monster Harper
BTW AB separatist Dennis Modry is in court for defrauding relatives suffering from Alzheimer.
@thebreakdownab.bsky.social:
“When asked if Alberta should stay in Canada, 70 per cent of respondents said the province should. Only 17 per cent believed Alberta should become an independent country & 4 per cent believe Alberta should join the United States.”
edmontonjournal.com/news/local-n…
@tiberiusfiles:
As soon as you talk about nukes or the hijab or democracy in the context of justifying a US-led bombing campaign I know you’re a fucking child who shouldn’t be trusted with a sharp object never mind political discourse
Mark Fucking Harper Nazi Carney is a monstrous traitor to all Canadians and the world by serving traitorous Danielle Smith and her incredibly stupid racist separatists and Pedo Nazi USA. I have listened to this repeatedly and am enraged, disgusted and want to throw up every time. Cruel Racist Douche Fucker Harper Shit:
@geneos.bsky.social:
For all those that thought this man was something different, something apart, here is the establishment stooge doing his best to play that role by covering up the most grotesque war crimes of the US and Israel.
He is where he is because he is a vassal of the elites.and, I believe, because he’s a rich souless religious white supremacist.
Why Canada and #Alberta need new pipelines . Its clear the Oil and Gas is alive and well and growing . Wake up Canada . #Liberal#Carney
Trans Mountain oil exports doubled in 2025, new port data shows.
#Cdnpoli#Canada#Oilglobalnews.ca/news/1172380….
@mrcdfw.bsky.social:
Trump bored with Iran “war”, sets sights on Canadayep, he’s got his evil ugly filthy eyes set on abusing Canadian kids. The fucker belongs in prison (along with the kid fucking corrupt catholic majority on SCOTUS), decades ago already. There is no nastier or more stupid human on earth, than trump.
@honeymoonaries:
im just not understanding how there is ample proof going around of the president molesting children and he is literally still the fucking PRESIDENT
@annaphylaxis.bsky.social:
Given he’s now attacked two countries he has been belligerent with in his comments, I do believe he will attack Canada given the chance. I don’t know what I’d do in that caseI will kill myself before I am forced to be a Nazi.
@3fecta.bsky.social:
In unrelated news, sales of Jack Daniels and Jim Beam have plunged nearly 70% in Canada.
@dirtdork.bsky.social:
So I know I’m a crank, but the health of the Great Lakes is no joke and involves coordinating 8 states and 3 provinces across 2 countries, and it’s actually fucking offensive to me, someone who lives here and likes drinking water, to use the cooperation to throw a threat/insult at Canada.
@tigerlily.northsky.social:
After Venezuela and Iran I don’t think he’s joking about Greenland and CanadaOf course he’s not joking, he’s a malicious sadistic kid rapist who believes he’s king of the world, and Carney is all in.
@liammci.bsky.social:
Canadians will be more pissed about this than Canada supplying weapons and equipment for the Iran War and that’s part of the problem.
@RashidaTlaib:
30% of the people killed in Iran so far are children.
@nigelb.bsky.social:
Given the proliferation of data centre applicns in Alberta with associated generation it’s good to see the AUC taking a hard line & simply closing the door on shoddy applications like that of Synapse for a data centre & 1400 MW of generation in Olds. Here’s a para from the closure letter: #abpoli
So, now that Herr Harper Carney is evilly getting rid of federal environmental impact assessments in Alberta, will Synapse – another fucking American company – reapply and get instant approval?
One of the other features of the application was apparently 600 units of backup diesel generators, each rated at 2.6 MW = 1560! Can you imagine the resulting noise & air pollution if that lot started up!
New warning: “Warming proceeding faster is not unexpected by climate models, but it is a cause of concern and shows how insufficient the efforts to slow and eventually stop global warming under the Paris Climate Accord have so far been.”
Global Warming Has Accelerated Significantly by G. Foster and S. Rahmstorf, 06 March 2026, Geophysical Research Letters, Advancing Earth and Space Sciences
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL118804Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Abstract
Recent record-hot years have caused discussion over whether global warming has accelerated. Previous analysis found acceleration (i.e., increase in warming rate) has not yet reached a 95% confidence level, given natural temperature variability. We remove the estimated influence of three main natural variability factors: El Niño, volcanism, and solar variation. The resulting adjusted and thus less “noisy” data show that there has been acceleration with over 98% confidence, with faster warming over the last 10+ years than during any previous decade.
Plain Language Summary
The rise in global temperature has been widely considered to be quite steady for several decades since the 1970s. Recently, however, scientists have started to debate whether global warming has accelerated since then. It is difficult to be sure of that because of natural fluctuations in the warming rate, and so far no statistical significance (meaning 95% certainty) of an acceleration (increase in warming rate) has been demonstrated. In this study we subtract the estimated influence of El Niño events, v-0 olcanic eruptions and solar variations from the data, which makes the global temperature curve less variable, and it then shows a statistically significant acceleration of global warming since about the year 2015. Warming proceeding faster is not unexpected by climate models, but it is a cause of concern and shows how insufficient the efforts to slow and eventually stop global warming under the Paris Climate Accord have so far been.
Key Points
- During the last decade, the rate at which Earth warmed increased substantially
- After removing the influence of known natural variability factors, the increase of the warming rate is statistically significant
- At the present rate, we will exceed the 1.5°C limit of the Paris Climate Accord by 2030
1 Introduction
The years 2023 and 2024 have been Earth’s hottest on record, and in 2024 global temperature exceeded 1.5°C above pre-industrial temperatures, although to breach the 1.5°C limit of the Paris Climate Accord this level would need to be exceeded not for a single year but for an average over 20 years (Bevacqua et al., 2025).
Since the 1970s, global mean surface temperature (GMST) has followed a rather steady upward trend, rising at an average rate of about 0.2°C/decade, together with ubiquitous fluctuations about that trend. Random variations can be very suggestive of a change in the trend, which caused speculation in the early 2000s that global warming had slowed or even stopped (the infamous “pause”), but detailed analysis found that this slowing was at no point statistically significant (Risbey et al., 2018).
More recently, discussion has focused on whether global warming has accelerated. Past change point analysis showed a clear acceleration around 1970 (Cahill et al., 2015; Miniere et al., 2023), at the end of a plateau phase starting ∼1940 usually attributed to a masking of the effects of increasing greenhouse gases by cooling aerosols in the atmosphere. This plateau is also the key reason robust acceleration is diagnosed for the period 1960–2020 (Beaulieu et al., 2024).
However, it remains unclear whether global warming has significantly accelerated further since the current upward trend started in the 1970s. A change point analysis (assuming stationary noise) performed on GMST data until 2023 did not find a significant change in warming trend after the 1970s (Beaulieu et al., 2024). We have reproduced this analysis and then included the year 2024, but that does not raise statistical significance to the 95% confidence level.
Samset et al. (2023) adjusted global temperatures for the effect of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and concluded there had been a modest increase in 20-year warming rate from about 0.17 to 0.21°C/decade (their Figure 2b), suggesting a “step-up in warming rate since around 1990” but without an objective change point analysis. Jenkins, Povey, et al. (2022) looked at two subsequent 10-year trends in GMST and discussed an increase from +0.18°C/decade in 2000–2009 to 0.35°C/decade in 2010–2019, arguing this could partly be due to reduced cooling effect of atmospheric aerosols.
Richardson (2022) discusses the acceleration rate for the period 1980–2020 by way of quadratic fits to two versions of GMST data: before and after adjusting the observations for ENSO, volcanism and solar activity following Foster and Rahmstorf (2011, hereafter referred to as FR11). He concludes that for 4 out of 5 GMST data sets considered, the adjusted data show a 95% significant acceleration of 0.036 ± 0.030°C/decade2, and one data set (GISTEMP) even for the unadjusted data. However, he provides arguments based on climate model ensemble simulations for the standard uncertainty range estimates being too small, so that the finding of significant acceleration would be premature, and he estimates that robust detection would be possible only from around the year 2026.
Finally, Hansen et al. (2025) have recently argued that global warming has accelerated, pointing to a diagram of the GISTEMP data, however without discussing the statistical significance of this claim.
We use two methods to test the null hypothesis of no change in the warming rate since 1970: fitting a quadratic function of time, and fitting a continuous piecewise-linear function which allows for a slope change at a time selected objectively by changepoint analysis, a model we call PLF-changepoint. This is exactly the method used by Beaulieu et al. (2024). As short-term natural variability in the data reduces the statistical significance of any changes in warming rate, we also applied the method of FR11 to estimate and remove variability due to volcanism, ENSO, and variations of solar luminosity. All three variability mechanisms can be quantified by independent measurements and their effect on global temperature established by a lagged correlation analysis using monthly data.
…
3 Results
Yearly averages of adjusted and unadjusted data are shown in Figure 1. Note how the variability is reduced in the adjusted data, and temperature peaks following strong El Niño events (e.g., 1998, 2016, 2024) are greatly reduced. The adjustments for the three natural variability factors in the Berkeley Earth data are shown in Figure 2; comparison to Figure 7 in FR11 shows that estimates based on the updated model are like those of the original model.
The models used for hypothesis testing are very different, and together they illustrate the fact that, in the framework of frequentist statistics, “statistical significance” is not confirmation of the test model, it is negation of the null hypothesis. The two test models cannot both be right; comparing their estimates of Earth’s warming rate over time in Figure 3, they paint dramatically different pictures. The blue line is the rate according to the PLF-changepoint model (light blue shading its 95% confidence interval); for the quadratic model the rate is shown in brown (confidence interval in gray). Their estimates of Earth’s warming rate over the last decade are incompatible.
Also included in Figure 3 is a red line showing the slope from windowed linear regression, a straight-line fit to moving 10-year time spans of the data. Each serves to estimate the warming rate at the midpoint of that time span; advancing by 1-year steps reveals the changing rate over time. This analysis agrees much better with the PLF-changepoint model than the quadratic. This suggests that the quadratic model, while a good choice to test for acceleration, is (in this case) a poor choice to estimate the present warming rate.
Table 1 lists the present warming rate according to both the quadratic and PLF-changepoint models; numbers in parentheses are standard errors of the final digits. It also gives the time of slope change for the PLF-changepoint model; like Beaulieu et al. (2024) we used annual averages for statistical testing, but here we list the year based on monthly data. Finally, we give the year in which global temperature will exceed 1.5°C if it follows the latter model into the near future, defined as the time when the model linear trend crosses 1.5°C. In case of a linear evolution, that corresponds to the mid-point of the 20-year period defined by IPCC as 1.5°C threshold. According to this, all data sets are near 1.5°C already and will cross that limit before 2030.
For a more general history of Earth’s warming rate, for each data set we fit a piecewise-linear function with slope changes every 10 years from 1895 to 2015 (PLF10). Figure 4 reveals that all data sources agree: the warming rate has been far higher during the last decade than any previous. Whether such rapid warming will continue remains to be seen, but if it does, global temperature will cross the 1.5°C limit in the very near future.
The main limitation of our method is that the removal of El Niño, volcanism, and solar variations is empirically based, but approximate and imperfect. For example, it is possible that the effect of El Niño on the 2023 and 2024 temperature is not completely removed.
4 Discussion
We have focused here on a pure data analysis to establish whether the observed global temperature changes reveal a statistically significant acceleration, when adjusted for the empirical effects of key natural variability contributions. We do not analyze the possible causes of the acceleration found in the data. Some acceleration of global warming is expected in the standard global warming scenarios as presented in the 6th IPCC Assessment Report, and the observed data are within the range of model predictions. Note that model differences are large given that ENSO variability is random and thus different in each model, while the observations just represent one particular realization of this stochastic process.
A number of other studies looked at possible specific drivers that could cause a strong recent warming acceleration. The leading hypothesis is the reduced load of cooling aerosols in the atmosphere, as a result of effective reduction in emissions. Aerosol cooling has declined by an estimated 0.1–0.3 W/m2 since the year 2000–2011. The trend in anthropogenic effective radiative forcing (ERF), the cause of global warming, has increased by 50% since 2000 (from 0.4 W/m2 per decade in 2000–2009 to 0.6 W/m2 per decade in 2010–2019), mainly driven by reduced aerosol cooling (Quaas et al., 2022). However, there is still substantial uncertainty regarding observations of aerosol loads and of their impact on global temperature, so that an expected acceleration for this reason is likely but not settled.
In conclusion, our analysis of GMST data after removing the best estimate of the influence of three natural variability factors reduces the noise level sufficiently to reveal a large and significant acceleration of global warming, regardless which statistical method is used. Note that the adjustments reduce the global temperature in 2024 and minimally in 2023 by removing effects of El Niño as well as the solar maximum. The evidence is thus strong that the statistical significance of warming acceleration is not due to outlier years in 2023 and 2024, but that global temperature has departed from its previous path since around 2015.
Stopping this trend is in our hands: studies show that global warming will stop around the time humanity reaches zero CO2 emissions (Jenkins, Sanderson, et al., 2022), but it can hardly be reversed. In the current political climate, however, it is quite possible that warming may continue its fast pace or even accelerate further. This much is clear: if the warming rate of the past 10 years continues, the Paris Agreement 1.5°C warming limit will be breached by ∼2030.
***
@PGDynes Jul 16, 2022:
Agriculture cannot survive at 50C+ soil temperatures for very long. Civilization cannot survive long without modern agriculture- connect the dots. On current trajectory this doesn’t end well. #heatwave
***
Nature’s Way by Spirit 2:30 Min. May 9, 2007
@dbcoll1957 15 years ago:
Possibly one of the most underrated, and greatest songs ever written. The melody and lyrics are as relative today as they were forty years ago.I was just chatting with a friend about donating my albums (I’m going to die soon, don’t want someone else to have to clean up after me), he asked which is your favourite. I said my main collection is classical, but my absolute best since the first time I heard it, is this album:
@briandobson3450 4 years ago:
I saw a Spirit concert right after this song came out. When they started playing this song people were screaming the usual way but once they heard the words and how unbelievable this song was all of a sudden nobody was making any noise. It was so powerful, I will never forget it. Listening to it still makes me tear up ! !me too. it’s agonizing because had humans stopped even then, in the 70’s, believing the cruel religious misogynistic fairy tales and made less humans, and raped women, earth and girls less, we might not be breathing toxic air, drinking fucking frac’d life threatening water, and suffering so horrifically with health problems, and dying from preventable diseases.
@judasplow25 8 years ago:
When the harmonizing kicks in it’s so sad and beautiful it makes you feel like crying. This song is a masterpiece!
omfg, both these press releases are pure evil. They read as though Herr Hideous hater of Environment and Indigenous wrote them. i don’t even want to waste time capitalizing, this shit is such greed sleaze.
and, the fucker carney pushing us into the Nazi USA kid rapists’ illegal CSAM producing AI and attacks on iran, and soon everywhere else by maniac israel, ’cause carney’s old brookfield has billions invested in the mid east and AI.
carney allowing this even at this draft stage, shows how hideous a fucking racist anti indigenous he is, saying he’s maintaining commitment to UNDRIP while in next “whereas” Nazi smith says Alberta sees UNDRIP as unbinding. FUCKERS. i am furious at the coming escalating pollution, noise, water loss, harms to fish, birds, wildlife etc, forests and rivers, and the climate chaos, but i am most furious at Carney enabling Smith’s hideous statement on alberta seeing UNDRIP as unbinding. UNDRIP is BINDING!
21 measly days the Nazi fucks give us to consult on their destructive plan to escalate resources for Nazi USA.
Maadaookii:
Hard to take talk of “shared values” seriously when Canada helped water down Indigenous rights at the UN while still prioritizing resource extraction, banking interests, and Crown authority over Indigenous sovereignty.
@watershedlab.bsky.social:
Hmm my gut reaction is that’s not good
@mondoab.bsky.social:
As in really, really bad.
@dcrinyyc.bsky.social:
It’s pretty wild that the Carney Conservative press releases sound just about exactly the same as the UCP separatist ones do.
@ruggedbroad.bsky.social:
Uh…Cole’s Notes?
Environmental assessment? By THIS government?
ydbelanger.bsky.social:
A not-so-subtle shot at both the Honour of the Crown and the Duty to Consult and Accommodate as well.
@sgbab.bsky.social:
I wonder how the Alberta separatist will use that view that UNDRIP is non-binding?
Carney letting Smith shit on Indigenous and UNDRIP in his latest betrayal of Canadians, our environment, safe air to breath, safe water to bathe in and ingest, safe land to live on and grow safe food on, only serves Nazi USA, his beloved Brookfield et al, the oil and gas rich – mostly American, coal rich – mostly Australian, and stupid stolen misogynist racist Nazi AI and data centres – mostly American, con job CCS which steals public funds to give to mostly American rich polluters to lie to us and pollute more, tarsands rape and pillage also by mostly American mega polluter douche fucker companies, and is likely to allow those mostly American companies to dump their massive toxic waste lakes directly into the Athabasca watershed.
All part of Trump’s, Harper’s, Carney’s and Smith’s plan to destroy Canada and give our resources to the kid-raping Fucking Nazi USA for likely big money in exchange and brownie points, which USA will use to build more bombs to kill more innocent people, massively pollute more, and destroy cultural and historic sites of immense value just because of fucking oil greed and stupidity, and having the wrong skin colour and or religion (which greatly pleases white supremacist fuckers like Musk, Trump, Harper, Smith, Carney.
Canada and Alberta reach agreement-in-principle to accelerate the construction of major projects in Alberta by Carney Gov’t, March 6, 2026 Ottawa, Ontario
The world is changing rapidly. In response, Canada is transforming its economy from one that is reliant on a single trade partnerbullshit! You, Mr. Carney, are betraying all non rich Canadians with your endless lies and appeasements and pleasuring Nazi Trump and his criminal kid raping murderous ultra stupid regime, and the vile kid and women abusing American corporations, like the AIs and X, and military more than any PM before you, a to one that is stronger and more resilient to global shocks. To drive this mission, Canada’s new government is partnering with provinces and territories to build major infrastructure projects that diversify our exports, create thousands of high-paying careers, and unlock Canada’s full potential as a global energy superpower.Using Trump’s stupidity and that of his kid raping regime to deregulate the worst polluters in Canada (oil, bitumen and gas in Alberta) is disgusting. Your lies and propaganda sound just like Stephen J. Harper’s (one with that name is in the Epstein files as a client). You don’t even have the imagination to create your own lies with which to bamboozle Canadians. Lying about thousands of “jobs” isn’t good enough for you, you pimp it up to thousands of careers? WTF? You disgusting fucking liar! There will not be hundreds of jobs, short term ones, created by your Trump appeasing shit, never mind thousands of careers. What careers? Picking up and incinerating millions of bodies of Canadians, livestock, fish and wildlife that die in the coming worsening heat waves, lack of water, empty rivers, toxic chemicals and microplastics everywhere, escalating diseases, climate chaos and climate change enraged wildfires, noisy polluting AI/data centre destroying electrical grids, families unable to afford food, shelter or cooling? Mr. Carney, you intentionally destroyed tens of thousands of careers and jobs, vital research and science, put endless hard working diligent Canadians out of work intentionally so as to take their salaries and budgets to give to fucking American billionaires – misogynistic kid rapist racist criminal CSAM-producing and mass-distributing American AI, heavy polluting archaic oil, gas and bitumen companies, mainly American, and the fucking genocidal Israel-run American mass kid-killing military. Canada does not need unlocking, we are already mighty polluting, water, community and health destroying. Canada needs to prepare for the devastation our over population and pollution has unleashed!
Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, and the Premier of Alberta, Danielle Smith, released a draft Co-operation Agreement between Alberta and Canada on Environmental and Impact Assessment, which will be consulted on for a twenty-one-day period. 21 days is an insult. This builds on similar agreements completed between the Government of Canada and the governments of British Columbia, New Brunswick, and Ontario.
Delivering quickly on the lies and polluting betrayals commitments in the Canada-Alberta Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed last November, this agreement would bring a “one project, one review” approach to major infrastructure initiatives in Alberta. It will create a more streamlined assessment translation, piss on harmed communities in the way of American and Australian rape and pillage and money grubbing by massive deregulation of toxic life destroying industries and letting them destroy as they please, without any impact assessments because you know damned well that Alberta is a Republican Hellscape that does not appropriately assess harms and toxicity by the greedy rich; Alberta only shits on the environment and in our drinking water while destroying Public Health to give the health funding to fucking Americans again. Fuck, Alberta gov’ts and AER and Environment let fucking frac’ers frac directly into community drinking water aquifers, and only punish the harmed when their water is contaminated and violate their rights if they dare speak up about it. process that delivers major projects faster, reinforces strong environmental protections, and ensures the rights of Indigenous communities are respected.Fuck, Carney’s a cruel shitty stupid boring ugly arrogant liar. What environmental protections? Carbon Fucking Capture? That you know is a scam which just intentionally steals from ordinary families to give to the fucking rich to pollute and harm more? No assessments means no mitigation! Ensures Indigenous rights are respected? WTF? You are allowing Smith to piss on UNDRIP! Smith and you, both vile racists, shit on Indigenous rights, every fucking time you open your mouths. Respecting Indigenous rights would have Canadians see you put a stop to Danielle Smith’s Separatists working to destroy Canada by giving Alberta to PedoTrump’s Nazis
Canada and Alberta are focused on what we can controljust another fucking lie: building a stronger, more sustainable?????, more competitive economy together. At this pivotal global moment, a new Co-operation Agreement will enable the conditions necessary for infrastructure, including pipelines, rail, power generationya, using poisonous water destroying ultra polluting frac’d fucking gas, and a strong and integrated transmission grid. Together, we are unlocking and growing natural resource production and transportation in Western Canada to position Canada as a leading destination for investment. MOUNTAIN TOP DESTROYING COAL MINES WITH NO ASSESSMENT? AI WITH NO ASSESSMENT? DUMPING TOXIC TARSHIT WASTE WITHOUT ASSESSMENT? WE ALL KNOW ALBERTA ASSESSES NOTHING, so you do too, AND IF IN THE RARE EVENT THERE ARE SEVERE IMPACTS, AER JUST GIVES APPROVAL REGARDLESS. FUCK.
Quotes
“In the face of global trade shifts, Canada and Alberta are launching the next phase of our partnership. Together, we will build big and build fast to create a stronger, more sustainable, more independent economy for Albertans and all Canadians.”
The Rt. Hon. Mark Carney,
“This agreement is a meaningful next step toward faster, more efficient project reviews, and includes the removal of federal oversight of projects that are squarely within the province’s jurisdiction to approve. This will see Alberta projects approved faster, and shovels in the ground sooner.”
The Hon. Danielle Smith, Premier of Alberta
“Through these co-operation agreements, we are working with provincial and territorial partners to
streamlineredundancy and duplication,we areenablingbuild a stronger, more resilient Canadian economyThe Hon. Dominic LeBlanc, President of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade, Intergovernmental Affairs, Internal Trade and One Canadian Economy
“We are keeping our promise to deliver a ‘one project, one review’ approach for major projects by putting in place co-operation agreements with provinces. That’s why I’m proud to announce the agreement with Alberta, which will strengthen how we work together to reduce overlap and delays, and allow us to build Canada strong – while
The Hon. Julie Dabrusin, Minister of the Environment, Climate Change and Nature
Quick facts
- The draft agreement will be posted for feedback on the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada’s “Let’s Talk Impact Assessment” website. Comments can be submitted online between March 6-27, 2026. Funding has been made available to support Indigenous groups’ participation in the comment period.
- In November 2025, Canada and Alberta signed an MOU that strengthens federal-provincial collaboration in the energy sector to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, unlock the full potential of Alberta’s energy resources, and create hundreds of thousands of new high-paying careers for Canadians.
- Through the Major Projects Office (MPO), the Government of Canada is driving tens of billions of dollars in further investmentTO MAKE NAZI AMERICANS MUCH MUCH RICHER AT THE EXPENSE OF CANADA AND CANADIANS, while creating the conditions for a better connected, more productive, and ambitious country.LIES LIES LIES
- Together, the firstand second tranches of major projects represent a combined investment of more than $116 billion in our economy and will create thousands of high-paying careers for Canadians.FUCKING LIAR! CARNEY’S SLASHING JOBS FOR CANADIANS, TENS OF THOUSANDS OF THEM, DESTROYING THE PUBLIC SERVICE AND VITAL RESEARCH IN AGRICULTURE, SCIENCE, HEALTH (SLASHING FUNDING AND SERVICES BUT NOT FOR MEN), WHILE HIRING HIS RICH DESTROY-ENVIRONMENT INVESTMENT PALS.
- The MPO is providing $40 million over three years to increase the capacity of Indigenous Peoples to engage early and consistently on major projects.FUCKING CHEAP BRIBERY. RACIST ZIONIST CARNEY. THAT MONEY WON’T EVEN BEGIN TO TREAT THE ENDLESS HEALTH CONDITIONS CARNEY’S HARPER-COPYING BETRAYALS WILL CAUSE
***
Faster approvals. Faster projects. by Nazi Danielle ultra racist Smith Trump worshippingUCP, March 6, 2026
A new agreement will restore provincial approvals on projects within the province’s jurisdiction, reduce duplication, and further unlock Alberta’s economic potential.
On this page:
The governments of Canada and Alberta have worked collaboratively to reach an agreement-in-principle on a Cooperation Agreement on Environmental and Impact Assessment that will see major projects built faster.
This new agreement-in-principle on environmental and impact assessment represents the next milestone reached following last year’s landmark energy agreement and builds on the removal of the oil and gas production cap, and the net zero power regulations in Alberta, turning shared commitments into concrete action.
Alberta’s government has heard clearly from industry and investors AND ONLY INDUSTRY AND INVESTORS, MOSTLY FUCKING NAZI KID RAPING AMERICANS, NOT ORDINARY ALBERTANS WHO WILL LIVE WITH THE TOXIC NOISY HARMSthat federal project assessments are redundant given the rigorous reviews and approvals that already take place at the provincial level.
The agreement will streamline assessment and regulatory processes, reduce duplication and help projects move forward more quicklyAND HELP GIVE CANCER, MASSIVE SUFFERING AND EARLY DEATHS TO MOST RURAL ALBERTANS WHERE THE ENDLESS UNMITIGATED HARMS WILL TAKE PLACE.
Through this cooperation agreement-in-principle, both governments have committed to taking steps to approve projects more efficiently, including:
- For projects primarily under provincial jurisdiction, Canada will recognize Alberta as best positioned to lead environmental assessments and will rely on Alberta’s environmental and regulatory review processes to evaluate project impacts.ALBERTA ONLY SHITS ON ALBERTANS AND THE ENVIRONMENT!
- For projects involving federal works, undertakings, or federal lands, Canada will work with Alberta to ensure the province’s environmental assessment and regulatory requirements are integrated into the federal review process where appropriate and at Alberta’s request.
- When both federal and provincial assessments apply to a project, Canada and Alberta will coordinate their reviews to reduce duplication and regulatory burden, aligning project requirements, timelines, and reporting wherever possibleMEANING ALWAYS AND ALWAYS IN ALBERTAS GREEDY ASSED FAVOUR TO PLEASE KID RAPIST TRUMP. Where similar conditions are proposed by both governments, federal requirements will defer to Alberta’s conditions and regulatory authority when provincial legislation, regulations, or processes are in place.
“This agreement is a meaningful next step toward faster, more efficient project reviews, and removes the need for federal approvals of projects that are squarely within the province’s jurisdiction. This will see Alberta projects approved faster, and shovels in the ground sooner.”
PremierNazi Trump worshipping
“In the face of global trade shifts, Canada and Alberta are launching the next phase of our partnership. Together, we will build big and build fast to create a stronger, more sustainable, more independent economy for
Albertans and all Canadians.”The Rt. Hon.Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada
“This agreement is about cutting red tape while
maintainingAlberta’sstrongassessment
“Through this agreement, the governments of Canada and Alberta affirm a shared commitment to
respecting
“The Cooperation Agreement announced today marks an important change for major project reviews in Alberta. This agreement puts decision-making squarely where it belongs — with the Government of Alberta.
Quick facts
- Negotiations related to methane emissions reduction and carbon pricing are ongoing between the Governments of Alberta and Canada, and the province is confident an agreement that supports industry’s ability to increase the development of our oil and gas resources WITH ZERO POLLUTION AND HARMS MITIGATION will be reached.
- Before the agreement is finalized, the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada will post the draft agreement for public comment for a period of 21 days.FUCKING HARPER-LIKE DISRESPECT TO ALBERTANS AND CANADIANS
- Following the comment period, feedback will be reviewed AND IGNORED IF OPPOSED and the agreement finalized between Alberta and Canada.
- The draft agreement acknowledges that Alberta’s government continues to challenge the constitutionality of the Impact Assessment Act (IAA). !!!!!!! JUST LIKE TRUMP, IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO PLEASE OR APPEASE NAZI FUCKING RAPE PILLAGE AND POLLUTE BUT OH SO SPECIAL AND RELIGIOUS ALBERTA
Related information
- Draft Co-operation Agreement between Alberta and Canada
- IAAC public engagement
- Federal-provincial energy partnership
***
Co-operation Agreement between Alberta and Canada
The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) is seeking feedback on a draft co-operation agreement with Alberta.BUT BOTH THE HARPER FEDS AND ALBERTA CONS WILL IGNORE ANY FEEDBACK THAT DOESN’T CELEBRATE THIS STUPIDITY AND YELL, BLESSED BE! PRAISE JESUS (Trump) AND DAVID PARKER AND JEFF FUCKERY RATH AND HIS DISGUSTING RATS SERVING KID RAPIST TRUMP AND HIS KID RAPIST NAZI REGIME, AND BLESSED BE IT’S TIME TO LEGALIZE RAPE AND SLAVERY OF WOMEN AND GIRLS! PLEASE COME DESTROY OUR HEALTH, ALBERTA’S WATER AND FARMS AND HOMES AND COMMUNITIES~!
When a proposed project requires an assessment by both the federal and provincial governments, Canada is committed toBEING GROSSLY HARPER-LIKE AND ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH AND CANADIAN HATING WHILE working with provinces to achieve “one project, one review.” Under this approach, federal and provincial governments work together to meet shared and respective responsibilities to protect the environment and respect Indigenous rights with the goal of a single assessment for a project.WHICH IN ALBERTA MEANS ZIP FOR ASSESSMENTS, AND SHITS FOR HARM MITIGATIONS AND MORE BILLIONS FOR ALREADY BILLION DOLLAR RAPING MOSTLY AMERICAN MEGA RAPE AND POLLUTING COMPANIES!
Co-operation agreements outline commitments and principles to guide how the federal and provincial governments will work together to eliminate duplication and streamline assessment processes on a project-by-project basis to enable “one project, one review.”
Have your say
We are seeking feedback on the draft co-operation agreement with Alberta.
The comment period is your chance to review the draft co-operation agreement and submit feedback. The comment period starts March 6, 2026, and ends March 27, 2026, 11:59 p.m. ET.
To provide a comment or upload a submission, please register or sign in.WANNA BET FUCKING TRAITORS CARNEY AND SMITH SEND THE PRIVATE INFORMATION, AND HOME ADDRESSES OF ALL CANADIANS OPPOSED TO TRUMP’S LAWLESS ICE OFFICES IN CALGARY AND OTTAWA!
Comments and submissions will be made public in the official language in which they are received. You can also consult comments and submissions published on the French page(External link).
ONLY POSITIVE GLOWING LOVING HEIL JESUS (HARPER) Comments received will inform the final co-operation agreement, including its implementation.
At a broader-level, IAAC sought comments last Fall 2025 on a consultation paper which outlines Canada’s proposed approach to working with provinces on the assessment of major projects, with the goal of “one project, one review.”
Visit the Let’s Talk Impact Assessment webpage to review the consultation paper on the proposed approach to working with provinces and view comments received. While the comment period on the paper is now closed, comments received on the paper continue to inform the drafting and finalizing of agreements and their implementation.
Comments submitted by March 27, 2026, 11:59 p.m. ET will be considered for the co-operation agreement with Alberta.
- Read the Draft Co-operation Agreement on Environmental and Impact Assessment Between Alberta and Canada
- Upload a submission
- Provide a comment
Draft Co-operation Agreement on Environmental and Impact Assessment between Alberta and Canada
Draft Co-operation Agreement on Environmental and Impact Assessment Between: Alberta as represented by the Minister of Environment and Protected Areas (“Alberta”) and Canada as represented by the Minister of Environment, Climate Change and Nature (“Canada”)
EVERYTHING BELOW IS HARPER BULLSHIT
WHEREAS Alberta and Canada signed a Memorandum of Understanding to strengthen energy collaboration and build a stronger, more competitive, and more sustainable economy on November 27, 2025, and part of that Memorandum indicated Alberta and Canada would negotiate a co-operation agreement on impact assessments on or before April 1, 2026, that reduces duplication through a single assessment process that respects federal and provincial jurisdictions;
AND WHEREAS Alberta has exclusive legislative jurisdiction over the development, conservation and management of non-renewable natural resources in the province, and decisions related to the management of those resources in the province as well as jurisdiction over local works and undertakings, property and civil rights, local matters of a private nature, provincial Crown lands and the generation of electricity;
AND WHEREAS Canada and Alberta agree to work toward efficiently and effectively implementing a streamlined assessment approach that defers, whenever possible, to provincial processes for projects and activities that primarily fall within Alberta’s exclusive legislative jurisdiction, to eliminate duplication;
AND WHEREAS Alberta and Canada recognize that responsibilities for the environment are shared and recognize responsibilities to consult with, and where appropriate, accommodate Indigenous Peoples when the Crown contemplates actions that could adversely impact their rights recognized and affirmed under the Constitution;
AND WHEREAS Canada and Alberta have each established robust processes for the high-quality assessment of the effects of certain types of projects, informed by rigorous science, Indigenous consultation, public participation, and community knowledge;
AND WHEREAS Canada and Alberta recognize the importance of implementing their assessment processes in a manner that respects federal and provincial jurisdiction and is transparent, coordinated, efficient and timely, enables each of them to exercise their respective powers and duties under the Impact Assessment Act (IAA) and the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA), and contributes to a positive investment climate in Canada;
AND WHEREAS Canada and Alberta are committed to improving efficiency of these assessment and permitting processes, which is critical to increasing regulatory certainty and to attracting investment in major projects and enhancing economic resilience, while ensuring environmental protections and Indigenous Peoples’ rights are respected;
AND WHEREAS Canada and Alberta are committed to respecting Indigenous Peoples’ rights recognized and affirmed under the Constitution, engaging in early, consistent, and meaningful consultation with Indigenous Peoples, in a manner that promotes reconciliation, and respects the rights and cultures of Indigenous Peoples, while advancing economic opportunities through Indigenous ownership and partnerships;
AND WHEREAS Canada is committed to issuing federal assessment decisions within a maximum of two years from receipt of the initial project description in accordance with the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada’s (IAAC) implementation policies and guidelines;
AND WHEREAS Canada maintains its commitment to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP);
AND WHEREAS Alberta continues to act in a manner that is INconsistent with treaties, the Canadian Constitution, and Alberta law, and views UNDRIP as non-binding;
NOW THEREFORE, Canada and Alberta agree to co-operate in the conduct of assessments in accordance with the provisions in this Agreement.
1. Reliance on Alberta’s Processes and Reciprocity
(1) When a proposed project is primarily within provincial jurisdiction, Canada will recognize Alberta as best placed to undertake an assessment and will rely on Alberta’s environmental assessment or regulatory processes to assess the effects of the project including, as applicable, to address adverse effects within federal jurisdiction, as defined in the IAA, as outlined in this Agreement.
(2) When a proposed project is or includes a federal work or undertaking or is on federal land Canada commits to integrating Alberta’s environmental assessment and regulatory process requirements into the federal assessment, if applicable and desired by Alberta, as outlined in this Agreement.
2. Early Notification and Information Sharing
(1) The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) and the Alberta ministries or regulators authorized under EPEA to carry out provincial environmental impact assessments (collectively the Alberta Regulator) will implement the following commitments regarding early notification and information sharing to ensure sufficient information is available to inform Canada’s approach to relying on Alberta’s assessment and permitting/regulatory processes and Alberta’s approach to relying on the federal assessment process, if applicable and desired by Alberta.
(2) IAAC and the applicable Alberta Regulator will notify each other as early as possible of a potential project that may be subject to both the IAA and the EPEA.
(3) IAAC and the applicable Alberta Regulator will work with each other and proponents, as early as possible, to ensure that federal and provincial assessment and permitting/regulatory responsibilities, legislative authorities, and potential requirements are identified;
(4) The applicable Alberta Regulator will share with IAAC information about means that would allow Alberta to address adverse effects within federal jurisdiction that may be caused by the proposed project and IAAC will share information that is relevant to the applicable Alberta Regulator; and
(5) IAAC and the applicable Alberta Regulator will undertake to inform Indigenous groups as early as possible, and share information where possible, regarding projects subject to this Agreement.
3. Decision-Making About the Conduct of a Federal Impact Assessment
(1) In alignment with clause 1(1) of this Agreement, IAAC commits to avoiding duplicative decision-making processes related to assessments by relying on the provincial environmental assessment or regulatory processes in circumstances where Alberta confirms that those processes will address the adverse effects within federal jurisdiction, as defined in the IAA, of projects that are primarily regulated by Alberta and/or there is a means other than impact assessment to address such effects, when making decisions about such projects as is reasonable after taking into account the factors under sections 9 and / or 16 of the IAA.
(2) In such circumstances, IAAC will provide for continued support and/or resources to Alberta, as requested and reasonable. This may include coordination of federal advice related to technical and regulatory aspects of the project related to potential adverse effects within federal jurisdiction, as defined in the IAA, or providing Alberta with such other resources as may be reasonably required to effectively address such potential effects. Such provision of continued federal support and/or resources may be considered as part of IAAC’s determination on whether a federal impact assessment is required.
4. Co-operative Assessments
(1) Notwithstanding clauses 1(1) and (2), in the event both federal and provincial assessments may apply to a proposed project, the parties are committed to avoiding duplicative processes. In such circumstances IAAC and the applicable Alberta Regulator will develop an arrangement, including roles, responsibilities, activities and timelines that would lead to a single assessment process that would meet the legislative requirements of both jurisdictions. The proposed arrangement will be reviewed and considered by the President of IAAC and the Deputy Minister-level head of the relevant Alberta Regulator.
5. Timeline for Completion of Impact Assessment
(1) Any impact assessment determined to be required under this agreement will be completed within a maximum of two years from receipt of the initial project description in accordance with IAAC’s implementation policies and guidelines.
6. Co-ordination of Potential Assessment Conditions and Decision-Making; and Permitting
(1) In the event that both federal and provincial assessments apply to a proposed project, IAAC and the applicable provincial public interest decision-maker or regulatory approval decision-maker(s) will jointly review potential conditions for the decision statement under the IAA and the applicable provincial decision or approval(s) to minimize duplication and regulatory burden, and to align, where appropriate, descriptions of the applicable project, reporting and notification requirements, terminology and definitions, and deadlines, to the extent possible.
Where duplication of potential assessment conditions has been identified, federal conditions will defer to provincial conditions and authority, when applicable provincial legislation, regulation, policies and/or processes exist.
(2) Where practical and appropriate, IAAC and the applicable provincial public interest decision-maker or regulatory approval decision-maker(s) will coordinate the opportunity for proponents, Indigenous Peoples, and the public to review potential assessment conditions.
(3) Canada and Alberta will develop a co-operative approach to coordinate federal and provincial permitting activities.
(4) Regardless of the approach to the assessment, Alberta and Canada will endeavour to work with key provincial and federal authorities on major projects to:
ensure the consideration of permitting and approval requirements in the assessment process, as appropriate, while recognizing the nature and intended functions of assessment and permitting processes;
share information about federal and provincial permitting progress on matters relevant to the federal and provincial assessments;
consider joint measures that could be undertaken to further support streamlined regulatory processes, early issues resolution, and effective engagement with Indigenous Peoples;
consider opportunities to improve co-ordination and integration of federal and provincial permitting processes and enhance existing joint tools and processes to expedite authorizations and permitting for major projects, including opportunities to increase reliance on provincial authorization processes; and
increase reliance on provincial reports and documents to meet subsequent federal regulatory and permitting processes and requirements, to the extent possible.
7. Indigenous Peoples
(1) When a proposed project is primarily within provincial jurisdiction, Canada will recognize Alberta as best placed to consult with Indigenous Peoples pursuant to Alberta’s consultation policies and practices in relation to the effects of relevant provincial decisions on the rights of Indigenous peoples.Sleazy fucker, Racist Zionist Harper-twin Carney betraying Indigenous by using Alberta’s hatred and racism of anyone not white male (usually Pretendian) christian to kill UNDRIP.
(2) IAAC and Alberta commit to respecting the rights of Indigenous Peoples of Canada recognized and affirmed by Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982, supporting meaningful Indigenous participation in the assessment process, and incorporating Indigenous perspectives in assessments.
(3) For certainty, nothing in this Agreement is intended to limit the ability of either of the Parties to co- operate, or enter into agreements or arrangements, with Indigenous Peoples respecting assessments or incorporate Indigenous-led assessments.
8. Information Sharing & Communications
(1) IAAC and the applicable Alberta Regulator will seek to identify opportunities to share information and streamline the collection and public dissemination of information through their respective assessment processes while ensuring each jurisdiction’s legislative requirements are satisfied.
(2) Canada will work with Indigenous Peoples with respect to the sharing and protection of Indigenous Knowledge.
(3) Alberta commits to receiving, sharing, and considering Indigenous Knowledge in accordance with Alberta’s legislation, policies, and practices.
(4) IAAC and the applicable Alberta Regulator agree to coordinate open, transparent, effective and timely communications with the public to support participation in assessments.
9. Participant Funding
(1) IAAC and the applicable Alberta Regulator will work to coordinate distribution of federal funding for participation in assessment, to the extent practicable, including the provision of funding to Indigenous Peoples to support their participation in assessments conducted under this Agreement while respecting the participation rights in provincial legislation.
10. Application of this Agreement
(1) The Parties agree that neither Canada nor Alberta cede any jurisdiction, right, power, privilege, prerogative or immunity by entering into this Agreement.
(2) The Parties acknowledge that Alberta is challenging the constitutionality of the IAA, which is a matter before the courts. By entering into this Agreement, Alberta does not acknowledge the IAA is constitutional.
(3) This Agreement does not create or alter any power or duty under any enactment of Canada or Alberta and is not intended to direct or fetter the exercise of such powers or duties.
(4) Should a proposed project be located on or cross a boundary with another province or territory with a portion of the project located within Alberta, the Parties would seek to apply the principles and approaches contained herein in co-operation with the other province or territory.
11. Issues Management
(1) The Parties will make reasonable efforts to agree on the interpretation and application of this Agreement and will work with each other to resolve issues related to the implementation of this Agreement through co-operation and consultation. This includes a commitment to provide reasonable advance notice to one another of decisions related to the implementation of this Agreement and an opportunity to provide comments.
(2) Should differences in views arise between the Parties on any matters related to the interpretation or implementation of this Agreement, including process and content issues, the Parties will, to the extent possible, seek to resolve their differences at the working level. Where these efforts are unsuccessful, either Party may request a meeting at a senior level, to seek a resolution of the issue or to agree on a process for resolving the issue and a timeframe within which to resolve it. Unless otherwise agreed, such meeting will be held within ten days of a Party first requesting a meeting.
(3) If the issue has not been resolved after the timeframe agreed to by the senior officials at the onset of the issue management process, the matter may be referred to the President of the IAAC and the Deputy Minister-level head of the relevant Alberta Regulator to facilitate resolution of the issues by the Parties. Where a matter is referred by either Party under this section, the President of the IAAC and the Deputy Minister-level head of the relevant Alberta Regulator will make reasonable efforts to facilitate resolution of the issues by the Parties.
(4) IAAC and the applicable Alberta Regulator recognize that this issue management process does not fetter the authority of IAAC under the IAA or of Alberta under the EPEA.
12. General Provisions
(1) This Agreement will be implemented on the date of the last signature of the Parties and may be amended in writing at any time by mutual consent of both IAAC and Alberta.
(2) This Agreement can be terminated by either Party after providing 90 days notice to the other Party.
(3) Notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement under clause 12(2), this Agreement continues to apply to any assessments that were being carried out under it on the day the Agreement was terminated.
Signatures (Minister-level)
*For Alberta, the English version of this agreement is authoritative.
@tiberiusfiles:
Replying to @WhiteHouse:
You are the enemy — of all humanity
Smith, Carney and their sickening separatists destroying Canada to please Nazi USA which serves genocidal Israel
@tiberiusfiles:
It’s surreal to imagine the countless lives that would be better — the people that would still be alive — if Israel didn’t exist
We’re talking tens, hundreds of millions of people here, whose lives might be materially better without this fucking aberration
@ZahraHamidia:
Iranian women now are finally free not to wear headscarves thanks to the U.S.
@parismarx.com:
america and israel proving themselves to be the great evil iran always said they were
@AdameMedia:
NOW: Secretary of War Hegseth, after killing school girls and energy infrastructure:
“Blessed be the Lord, my rock. Who trains my hands for war and my fingers for battle.”
He is a radical Christian terrorist.
@chadbourn.bsky.social:
France’s former Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin has called for sanctions against Israel and the US over their attacks on Iran:
“We say clearly to the United States that their war against Iran is illegal, illegitimate, and dangerous.”
Refer also to:
FUCK, if only the disgusting misogynistic fairy tale had been writen this way:
