Joseph Goebbels:
“You can’t change the masses. They will always be the same: Dumb, gluttonous and forgetful.”
Must watch Francesca Albanese’s new report (which caused Nazi Trump, the greedy painted orange demented cruel slug of inhumanity, to demand her removal):
Francesca Albanese urges businesses to end Israel ties to stop “economy of genocide” | HRC59 9:16 Min. by UN Human Rights Council, July 3, 2025
Also Must Watch: Q & A Francesca Albanese urges businesses to end Israel ties to stop “economy of genocide” | HRC59 1:02:45 by UN Human Rights Council, July 3, 2025
BREAKING: The Trump administration has formally requested the United Nations remove Francesca Albanese @FranceskAlbs from her role as special rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, citing her “virulent antisemitism and support for terrorism” … according to private communications between U.S. and U.N. officials obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
I believe when satanic “christian” white supremacists in the racist west and Israel, profiting massively off genocide, finish exterminating all Palestinians (including Christian Palestinians), all Muslims, all Arabs in the Middle East, their greed-and-hate-fuelled killing will not stop. They’ll start exterminating others they want to steal riches, oil, gas, water, land, farms, minerals (eg Ukraine, Canada, Greenland, etc) from, and wipe out cultures, histories, religions, health care, education, arts, etc to feed their rich cruel insatiable egos and please their mass-murdering mass-torturing profit-raping war machines.
And when there is nothing left on earth to steal from others, the mass murderers will mass murder what ever is still living, for no reason at all, because killing makes money.
@PeterCronau July 1, 2025:
Federal Court finds criticising Israel, the IDF, and Zionism over the genocide in Gaza, is NOT antisemitic.
Sensational findings by judge:
- “Political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, is not by its nature criticism of Jews in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity.”
- “Disparagement of Zionism constitutes disparagement of a philosophy or ideology and not a race or ethnic group.”
More:
‘The Federal Court found passages in an interview and sermon by Mr Haddad contained critical and disparaging things about the actions of the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza and about Zionists.
‘However, the judge found the “ordinary, reasonable listener” would not understand those things to be about Jewish people in general.
“That person would understand that not all Jews are Zionists and that disparagement of Zionism constitutes disparagement of a philosophy or ideology and not a race or ethnic group,” Justice Stewart said.
“Also, political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, is not by its nature criticism of Jews in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity.”
@timand2037:
However, Justice Angus Stewart found the speeches contravened the Racial Discrimination Act and rejected Mr Haddad’s defences.
The court found the series of lectures conveyed “disparaging imputations” about Jewish people, based on race or ethnic origin, that were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate and intimidate Jews in Australia.
@PeterCronau:
However, the Federal Court finds criticising Israel, the IDF, and Zionism over the genocide in Gaza, is NOT antisemitic.
@timand2037:
Correct, but since Haddad lost the case the distinction needs explanation.
Sometimes losing is winning
@VoteSmall:
Be interesting to see if Jews attacking Arabs & Christians will be brought before the courts or banned from entering Australia. I’m for free speech in any case.
@IamTom1975:
In the West Bank and Gaza.
This was a week ago. The Zionists settlers are the equivalent of Al Qaeda or ISIS. They are completely radicalised psychos to the point where they are a mirror image of a radicalised Islamic terrorist. There’s no difference.
@MintPressNews:
Israeli settlers are burning down the Christian town of Taybeh in the West Bank
The village is known for its uniquely all-Christian population.
Cars, lands and home all attacked in a series of violent pogroms aimed at uprooting Palestinian communities.
Federal Court orders series of Islamic preacher Wissam Haddad’s lectures be removed from social media by Jamie McKinnell, 30 Jun, 2025, ABC news Australia
In short:
A judge has ruled a series of lectures by Sydney preacher Wissam Haddad must be removed after finding them to contain “racist and antisemitic material”.
The lectures in questions were a series of posts made by Mr Haddad, also known as Abu Oysayd, in 2023.
In October 2024, the Executive Council of Jewry launched legal action against Mr Hassad’s speeches, alleging they contravened the Racial Discrimination Act.
A series of lectures delivered by an Islamic preacher at a Sydney prayer centre must be removed from social media under orders from a Federal Court judge who found they contained “fundamentally racist and antisemitic” material.
Wissam Haddad, who is also known as Abu Ousayd, gave the speeches at Bankstown’s Al Madina Dawah Centre in November 2023.
In the Federal Court, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) alleged he contravened the Racial Discrimination Act, including by portraying Jewish people as “wicked”, “scheming”, “vile”, “mischievous” and “descendants of apes and pigs”.
Mr Haddad’s lawyers argued the speeches were derived in substance from religious texts including the Koran, were delivered only to a Muslim audience in private and did not refer to Australian Jewish people.
Justice Angus Stewart today found the speeches contravened the Racial Discrimination Act and rejected Mr Haddad’s defences.
The court found the series of lectures conveyed “disparaging imputations” about Jewish people, based on race or ethnic origin, that were reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate and intimidate Jews in Australia.
“The imputations include age-old tropes against Jewish people that are fundamentally racist and antisemitic; they make perverse generalisations against Jewish people as a group,” the judge said in a summary of his decision.
Effects on Jewish Australians ‘profound and serious’
In his full judgment, Justice Stewart said the established imputations — or meanings — were “devastatingly offensive and insulting”.
He said Jewish people in Australia would have experienced the comments to be harassing and intimidating, “all the more so” because they were made at a time of “heightened vulnerability and fragility”.
“That is because of their profound offensiveness and the long history of persecution of Jews associated with the use of such rhetoric,”
Justice Stewart said.
“Those effects on Jews in Australia would be profound and serious.”
The court found passages in an interview and sermon by Mr Haddad contained critical and disparaging things about the actions of the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza and about Zionists.
However, the judge found the “ordinary, reasonable listener” would not understand those things to be about Jewish people in general.
“That person would understand that not all Jews are Zionists and that disparagement of Zionism constitutes disparagement of a philosophy or ideology and not a race or ethnic group,” Justice Stewart said.
“Also, political criticism of Israel, however inflammatory or adversarial, is not by its nature criticism of Jews in general or based on Jewish racial or ethnic identity.
“The conclusion that it is not antisemitic to criticise Israel is the corollary of the conclusion that to blame Jews for the actions of Israel is antisemitic; the one flows from the other.”
Justice Stewart said he was satisfied Mr Haddad and the centre should be ordered to publish corrective notices on their social media accounts for 30 days, but will hear the parties further on the terms.
He said the ECAJ’s case had been “overwhelmingly successful” and there was no reason why Mr Haddad should not have to pay costs.
Lectures labelled as ‘dangerous’ speech
The ECAJ’s counsel Peter Braham SC labelled the speeches as “dangerous” last month and said they were calculated to “denigrate all Jewish people”.
He said they aimed to inform the audience about Jews “as a people” using stories from the time of the prophet.
Mr Haddad had sought to persuade followers that Jewish people had “certain immutable and eternal characteristics” that cause them to “come into conflict with Muslims” and be “the objects of contempt and hatred”, Mr Braham said.
Andrew Boe, representing Mr Haddad, told the hearing a democratic society must include room for “the confronting, the challenging, even the shocking” and urged the court to take a “rigorous and detached” approach in applying the law.
Mr Haddad’s legal team said some speeches contained direct and allegorical references to the Koran and Hadith, together with “political commentary on the Gaza war”.
When Mr Haddad stepped into the witness box, he initially appeared to distance himself from the publication of the lectures online, but eventually accepted he was aware they would be published.
Under cross-examination he insisted he was speaking in his sermons about “Jews of faith, not of ethnicity” and denied he had set out to attract attention by giving controversial and disparaging speeches about Jews.
He rejected Mr Baraham’s proposition that he “just wanted to be controversial by being racist”.
Mr Haddad’s lawyers also argued that if the court found the speeches were unlawful, a section of the Racial Discrimination Act must be unconstitutional because it would be prohibiting the free exercise of religion.
Preacher maintains he has right to quote scripture
Outside court, Mr Haddad’s lawyer Elias Tabchouri said his client maintained his sermons were delivered in the context of religious instruction and based on scriptural references, and were never intended to insult any group based on ethnic identity.
“The words he spoke were those from the scripture and he maintains he has the right to quote religious scripture, as all parties do,” Mr Tabchouri said.
“The court has found he has that right. Further to that, the court has found that simply criticising what the Israeli nation has done in Gaza is not antisemitic, and that position has been affirmed by the court.”
Peter Wertheim, co-chief executive of the ECAJ, said the case was not about freedom of expression or religion.
“It was about antisemitism and the abuse of those freedoms to promote antisemitism,” he said.
“Common decency should dictate that free speech and freedom of religion do not include the right to racially vilify people.”
Justice Stewart said he was satisfied Mr Haddad should be restrained from “conveying the established imputations other than in private”.
Asked whether he thought Mr Haddad would obey the court orders, Mr Wertheim said that was a matter for him.
“I’m assuming he will get legal advice that in this country court orders are binding on everybody,” Mr Wertheim said.
“That applies to religious practice and obedience to court orders.
“If not, we’re going to be back here in a contempt case.”
Refer also to:
Financing Israel/Zionism bribing white racist privileged politicians to aid in the genocide with stolen Palestinian oil and gas (that must be frac’d):
2025: Pro Peace Heroes in Saint John’s, NL. David Levin: “Zionism needs to be a banned ideology.”
2025: Israel’s genocide: Microsoft has “blood on their hands” and jury awards massive $167M in punitive damages against spyware company NSO Group (made Pegasus spyware).Chair of the racist misogynistic democracy-destroying IDU, Herr Hideous Nazi Harper, profits off of Israel mass killing Palestinian kids too. I’d like to know how many $millions his firm profited and still profits from Palestinian blood
2024:
etc. etc. etc.
2019:
2016:
Cartoons from many years ago:
1979: International terrorism, challenge and response: proceedings of the Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism by Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism (1979) Edited by Benjamin Netanyahu
“Terrorism – the deliberate and systematic killing of civilians so as to inspire fear – was shown persuasively to be, beyond all nuance and quibble, a moral evil, infecting not only who commit such crimes, but those who, out of malice, ignorance or simple refusal to think, countenance them.”
Source of above quote: Professor Benzion Netanyahu (Bibi’s dad!), from his opening remarks at the 1979 conference proceedings, Edited by Benjamin Netanyahu.
1981: Inner cover 1979 International Terrorism challenge and response essays speeches by 50 leading figures editor Benjamin Netanyahu