@tiberiusfiles:
In the same week, different US judges ruled water is not a human right but access to AI-generated child porn is, and there are people who still don’t get why we call it the Epstein Empire?
@ladymitopinion.bsky.social:
I think an administration that won’t do anything about mass pedophilia happening within its ranks shouldn’t be allowed to tell parents whether or not they should vaccinate their kids
͏ 
͏Above cartoon is nice visualization showing why the Repugs and Alberta separatists want to take women’s right to vote away. They can’t stand us having any power – including the right to vote (thanks to fucking religions); they want all the power so that they can rape, steal, abuse, use as slave labour to feed their overblown egos (thanks to fucking religions) and murder kids and women without going to prison.
| They’re Coming for Our Daughters, An Abortion, Every Day Rerun by Jessica Valenti, Aug 11, 2026, Abortion Every Day We’re revisiting a few of readers’ favorite columns while I’m on vacation. This one was inspired by a little-noticed Heritage Foundation document that targets girls and young women. Once you know about conservatives’ plan for our daughters, it’s hard not to see every single Republican and every single Canadian Pee Pee Con politico, and likely Mark Carney too, because he’s catholic and he invited misogynist religious extremist Kevin Roberts, Heritage Foundation, Opus dei creep, to train Carney’s cabinet) move of the last few years through that lens. …My daughter has had a difficult few months in school. By some administrative fluke, she ended up in a class where she was the only girl—it was just Layla, surrounded by a dozen or so 15-year-old boys. She could have found it tolerable, I think, if not for the rape jokes. That’s right, in the year 2026—in a progressive Brooklyn high school—my daughter had to listen to her classmates ‘joking’ about rape. These are boys she thought were her peers and friends, some of whom she’s known since pre-school. And though the school ended up handling it well, I watched Layla’s light dim a little every time she came home from that class. For her, it was a regular reminder that the world sees her as less human, less worthy of dignity. Just less. It’s a feeling I remember well me too, I still am made aware of it, daily, by our patriarchal religions, regulators, police, courts and politicians, and one I couldn’t stop thinking about this weekend as I considered conservatives’ plan for the next generation of girls and young women. Because what they have in store for our daughters isn’t just about policy and politics, but dimming their collective lights.A few weeks ago, the Heritage Foundation—the powerhouse organization behind Project 2025—released a 250-year roadmap to “save America.” Written by authors with close ties to the Trump administration, the document is a how-to guide for subjugating girls and young women: a detailed plan to push them out of college, funnel them into early marriage and motherhood, and then trap them there. The document is part of a broad, well-funded campaign to reassert misogynist control by targeting women while they’re young and pliable—and chip away at one of Democrats’ most supportive demographics in the process. According to Heritage, the future of the country relies on more straight married couples having more children. To make that happen, the group says, the government has to address multiple factors that “conspire” to drive down birth rates: “These include the proliferation of birth control, more prospects for women to receive higher education and work outside the home…” In other words, pretty much every major advancement for women’s rights and freedom is a problem. And whether it’s eradicating “cheap and ubiquitous” access to contraception or appointing family court judges hostile to divorce, Heritage has the answer. But Heritage is stupid and wrong. Birth rates are down in the western world because people see that greed by the rich ensures there is no future for our species. Wildfires worsened by our escalating pollution and impossible to stop, wiping out entire towns; towns watching their last dregs of drinking water go to frac’ers and AI data (centres which no one wants, except kid and women abusing men). Toxic chemicals everywhere and in everything, including breast milk and babies and birds’ eggs. Floods and storms destroying billions in vital infrastructure, with no relief in sight because we refuse to reduce our pollution. Most stupid, most vulgar species on earth, made a million times more stupid and vulgar via religions.Like the conservative movement more broadly, the organization wants young women to believe this is all being done for their benefit: that work is soulless and unfulfilling, that feminism has made women miserable, and that the real path to happiness is being a stay-at-home mom. The latest right-wing mantra for women? “Less burnout, more babies.” This isn’t some fringe effort. From the tradwife explosion to MAHA disinformation about birth control, conservatives are pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into convincing the next generation that the rapid erosion of their rights isn’t a political and moral crisis—but a lifestyle upgrade. Why bother with the horror of the professional and public world, young women are told, when you can just opt out? That message isn’t limited to Turning Point USA conferences, either: over the last year, outlets from CBS News to NPR have hosted earnest ‘debates’ on whether feminism “failed women.”Even the Vice President of the United States is advising women to give up work for motherhood. At the March for Life last month, JD Vance said, “you’re never going to find great meaning in a cubicle or in front of a computer screen—but you will find great meaning if you dedicate yourself to the creation and sustenance of human life.” Common sense. The most vulgar corrupt horrid religious (catholic is one of the most abusive cruel misogynistic religions on earth; Jesus would howl to burn it all down) pedophile enabling politicos working to take women’s and girls’ rights away the better and easier for men to rape, murder and abuse them without legal consequence. (He said something near-identical in a 2022 tweet.) But there’s only so much choice conservatives plan to give young women in the matter—and other powerful misogynists are done bothering with pretense. This week, billionaire pro-natalistsleazy misogynist douche fucker Elon Musk—who bemoans birth control and built an AI tool that lets men “undress” women’sAND KIDS’ images—co-signed this chilling X post: Women aren’t sad, we’re enraged, furious; we’ll come for cruel balls with chainsawsWhen I say they’re coming for our daughters, I’m not exaggerating. The powerful people obsessed with the (white) birth rate and enforcing ‘traditional’ values and norms know they need young women to do it—whether those young women like it or not. What do you think provocateur Jordan Peterson meant when he talked about “enforced monogamy” as a solution to men’s violence in 2018? Or why, nearly a decade later, one of the country’s most popular podcasts would seriously debate whether young men’s inability to find sexual partners and have children is a “mass extinction event” akin to “genocide”? “Does society have a responsibility to intervene in some way, to course correct this?,” Diary of a CEO host Steven Bartlett asked. If this were just about men’s overwhelming desire to advance their genetic lines, we’d hear podcasts and pundits talking about IVF or how to incentivize surrogacy. And if conservatives were simply concerned about the birth rate, they’d propose policy solutions that actually help families—like paid parental leave, affordable child care, and laws that don’t kill pregnant women and put them in prison if they miscarry or their fetus dies. Pretending this is some noble pursuit to save civilization is just a way to launder rape apologia and misogyny. The actual goal is good old-fashioned control and a world where women—young women, especially—have no choices. And let’s be blunt: abortion bans and forced pregnancy were just the beginning. Key to conservatives’ plan is getting girls and young women married and pregnant as early as possible. How early? Well, Heritage cites women in their early twenties as “more fertile” (yuck), but the authors also scold Democrats for “stigmatizing teen mothers.” One of those authors, Emma Waters, is working with the White House on a campaign to “persuade” women to have more babies—an effort that includes scrapping sex education in favor of “menstrual cycle classes” designed to teach the optimal time to conceive. At the same time, the Trump administration has blocked funding for teen pregnancy prevention programs, blasting them as “radical indoctrination,” while Heritage has quietly dropped its hand-wringing about teen pregnancy in favor of a new term: the “non-marital teen birth rate.”In other words, the problem is no longer that girls are getting pregnant before adulthood—it’s that they’re not married first. Pair that with the fact that most teen pregnancies are fathered by adult men, and with Republicans’ ongoing resistance to child marriage bans, and you start to see exactly what kind of future they’re fighting for. Legalized rape and pedophilia, and criminalizing consent – that’s why, in my view, the Repugs, especially the religions ones, are delighted to have a convicted felon pedophile rapist as King of America Consider what all of this means for girls across the country, especially those in conservative-led states. Sex education is being eliminated or replaced with propaganda like ‘Baby Olivia’ videos, lessons telling girls that sex makes them ‘dirty’, and Trump’s menstrual classes. Planned Parenthood and other reproductive healthcare clinics are being shuttered in favor of crisis pregnancy centers, which doesn’t just make it harder for young people to access abortion—but contraception, too. In fact, it’s only a matter of time before Republicans argue teens shouldn’t have birth control at all. They’ve already laid the groundwork by banning gender affirming care for minors, arguing that hormones harm young bodies. Girls who would normally turn somewhere for help will also be out of luck. Conservatives aren’t just systematically stripping away support systems for teens, they’re eradicating basic information. Thus the insane drive for AI data centres everywhere feeding lies and fabricated history, religion, science, humanities, art. etc., and mass surveillance to control the masses. Attorneys general in several states are fighting to ban ads for pro-choice groups that share information about abortion, while legislators across the country are introducing bills to make those sites illegal in the first place. Lawmakers are also working to quash pro-choice speech in high schools and colleges—like banning campus health centers from even mentioning abortion, including in states where it’s legal. And under so-called ‘abortion trafficking’ laws, grandmothers and older sisters could face felony charges for helping a teen end their pregnancy. There are even attempts to criminalize lending a young person gas money to leave the state, or sending them a text message with a URL to an abortion clinic. They want our daughters and granddaughters to have zero information about their bodies and sex all the easier to rape them, no ability to protect themselves from pregnancy, limited choices for an intellectual and professional life, and—once our girls have been corralled into early marriages—few opportunities to leave. Push them into the home, force them to get pregnant, rinse and repeat. And while it’s certainly easier for the Heritage Foundation and their allies if American girls fall in line, conservatives in power are just as happy to force them onto that narrow path. As with all coercive men, the fact that young women don’t want this is part of the appeal.The truth is that the next generation is as ambitious as ever. The futures they want for themselves are broad and bright. Sometimes that includes husbands and children, sometimes it doesn’t. The most recent studies show that young men are actually far more likely to name children as their top marker of personal success. (Women cite financial independence and their careers.) It’s young men who are having a hard time finding partners, and it’s young men who are lonely.In other words, despite years of cultural messages to the contrary—it’s men, actually, who are desperate for marriage and babies.I suppose that’s what Heritage’s roadmap and the conservative agenda is really about: building the world that men want, and forcing women to live inside it.I’m far more interested in the big, bright life my daughter wants, and ensuring it stays her own. |
@tiberiusfiles:
The US is both a paper tiger and a cabal of pedophiles. Oh how this downfall will be great to behold, and the cracks are EVERYWHERE.
Feb 12, 2026
Before Donald Trump was elected president for a second time, the Heritage Foundation published Project 2025—a 900-page roadmap detailing an ultra-conservative wishlist and how the administration could deliver every single item on it. At the top of that list was the dismantling of reproductive rights: the blueprint laid out how the White House could move towards a national abortion ban, restrict birth control, push women back in the home, enable anti-abortion violence, attack private health data, and more.
Just over a year into President Trump’s second term, Reproductive Freedom for All reports over half of Project 2025’s reproductive rights agenda has been completed: defunding Planned Parenthood, anti-abortion judicial appointments, the green-lighting of anti-abortion violence, attacks on emergency abortions, and more, for instance.
The Heritage Foundation has been pulling Trump’s strings for years now. In his first term, the organization boasted that the president had enacted two-thirds of their agenda within a year.
The far-right, Christian nationalist think tank’s sweeping successes have seriously emboldened them—so much so that they’ve written a plan for the next 250 years.
In January, the Heritage Foundation published “Saving America by Saving the FamilyNothing can save America; Trump’s destroyed it for his besties, Putin and Netanyahu, and to fill his pockets and those of his family members with billions, and those of the billionaires that got him into power, as Americans watched.: A Foundation for the Next 250 Years”—yet another chilling roadmap, this one to erase LGBTQ families, decimate the social safety net, and push women out of public life altogether. As Jessica reported on Monday, “Saving America” also hones in on young women and girls, taking the Republican Party’s festering obsession with the birth rate and forced births to the next level. Its authors include an all-star cast of far-right extremists, including , a Health and Human Services Department official in the first Trump administration who was deemed too controversial to serve in this one. Other writers include Emma Waters, one of the leading right-wing voices against IVF, and Jay Richards, the author of nearly a dozen Christian nationalist books. These are the Trump World figures determined to shape the next 250 years of American life according to their vision.
Heritage clearly sees the end of Roe and the election of Trump as first steps toward a broader, Christian nationalist, cultural and political revolutionaka Hell on Earth. They understand that extreme policy proposals alone can only take their vision so far. They need sweeping changes in cultural attitudes to compel women to accept fewer rights—or even see fewer rights as freedom. In order for their plan to work, it’s going to take the indoctrination of an entire generation.
That’s why “Saving America” mirrors what we’ve been watching unfold on social media: seemingly apolitical female lifestyle influencers priming young women and girls to accept fewer rights and instead seek “fulfillment” in marriage and homemaking.
There’s a lot to this document—and Heritage (rightly) assumes most people won’t read it. But Abortion, Every Day has, and we’re going to take you through everything you need to know. Feel free to skip ahead using the headers below, and share with your communities. The best way we can fight back is by arming each other.
The “Saving America” plan for…Ending No Fault Divorce, Encouraging Early Marriage, Pushing Women Out of Public Life, Increasing the Birth Rate (For Some), and Targeting Young People—AND how we can use their 250-year plan against them.
Ending No-Fault Divorce
“Saving America” foremost reads as one long screed against no-fault divorce, which allows people to end a marriage without the burden of proving wrongdoing by their partner:
“The no-fault system has in effect turned into a ‘no reason needed’ system. … The interests of any children are not considered at all in whether a divorce should be granted.”
Throughout the document, the organization rails against the evil of “easy divorce,” blaming it for everything from poverty to societal decline writ large.It’s the billionaires stupid!But before no-fault divorce, spouses had to prove adultery, desertion, or abuse—an especially high bar for domestic violence victims operating in a legal system primed to disbelieve and re-traumatize them. (It’s no surprise that legalizing no fault divorce led to a 20% drop in the female suicide rate.)
Not that it matters to Heritage, which regards the end of no-fault divorce as yet another pathway to entrap women in the home. And they’re not alone. Back in 2022, Media Matters identified attacking no-fault divorce as a rising trend among popular right-wing influencers. In 2021, while campaigning for the U.S. Senate, JD Vance suggested divorce is wrong even if a marriage is abusive:Thanks to religions, which hate women and girls.
“This is one of the great tricks that I think the sexual revolution pulled on the American populace, which is the idea that like, ‘Well, OK, these marriages were fundamentally, you know, they were maybe even violent, but certainly they were unhappy.’ And so getting rid of them and making it easier for people to shift spouses like they change their underwear, that’s going to make people happier in the long term.”
The right’s position against divorce is growing more explicit by the day: the Texas GOP’s 2022 platform includes a proposal “to rescind unilateral no-fault divorce laws and support covenant marriage.”Religions and the religious love to cause suffering in others, it’s an addiction. Who suffers most in abusive marriages? Women. Religions, especially catholic, hate women, and work like fiends to make women suffer.
Heritage advocates for “covenant marriage,” as well: unlike a standard contract marriage, covenant marriages—which are available in Arizona, Arkansas, and Louisiana—require couples to seek premarital counseling, or require proof of abuse, felony crimes, and other aggravating factors to divorce.
Covenant marriages are something couples opt into—but not all of Heritage’s plans are freely chosen. And while the group knows they can’t ban no-fault divorce overnight, they can use the same tactic they did with abortion: they can chip away at access bit by bit.
The group recommends limiting and gatekeeping alimony payments to discourage women from seeking divorce, overhauling custody laws that favor primary caretakers (ie. women), and—crucially—electing family court judges who are against divorceoh great, catholics on the bench, there is nothing more misogynistic and LGBTQ+ hating than catholics. In other words, they want to empower people who will prevent couples from getting the divorces they want.
But before Heritage can stop people from getting divorced, they need to get them married.Too funny. Women and girls need to refuse all marriage to maintain their sanity, bodies and rights.
Encouraging Early MarriageOMG! My biggest mistake was saying yes to marriage. I had no idea that I had the right to say “No” and I needed to have said, “No.” Marriage is just about making girls and women slaves, property, and “legalized” pedophilia when girls are married off to ancient men. Just gross. Pimped by fucking abusive religions.
The authors of “Saving America” are bereft that more people (women) aren’t getting married—and that those who are are getting married later in life. They report that a third of young people today are projected to never marrysmart people!! The male brain is slow at developing, it’s not fully developed until in the thirties. No man ought to marry before then, and bemoan that American women’s median age upon first marriage is 28.6.
The Heritage Foundation asserts that these declining marriage rates and delays in marriage are to blame for, well, everything—from “weaker educational attainment among children” and “higher poverty,” to “neighborhoods hollowed out by instability.”Bullshit. Religion is to blame for all things fucked up in USA, including war, poisoned agriculture, lust for money and more money creating severe poverty and too powerful toxic corporations poisoning communities, education (politicos stealing from education to give that money to rich corporations destroying life on earth) and public health. Money can only be made by stealing from somewhere or someone else, which religious fucks like Heritage Foundation and Mark Carney, Steve Harper, etc, enable. Marriage and divorce has fucking nothing to do with it.
Incidentally, the rest of the plan rails against welfare and the social safety net, suggesting that without access to these resources, women would have fewer options but to marry and have children. Welfare, the authors write, “encouraged women to rethink their relationship to men, marriage, children, and family.”
The organization suggests that the scant resources our country provides to single parents somehow punish or disincentivize marriage. They call for the government to address this by “increasing federal marital benefits,” and craft all policies based on how they would boost marriage and build families:
“The President should issue a series of executive orders requiring every grant, contract, policy, regulation, research project, and enforcement action involving the federal government to do the following: Explicitly measure how it helps or harms marriage and family, block actions that discriminate against family formation, and give preference to actions that support American families.”
The policy proposals read almost 1:1 like a page from fascist Italy’s “Battle for the Births” campaign in the 1920s.
And that’s the thing—when it comes to exposing the right’s extremism, sometimes, all you have to do is let them speak for themselves:
“If women view marriage and children as disrupting their careers or straining their finances, they may forgo or delay marriage and choose not to have children or to have fewer than they would otherwise. This greater female workforce participation has put downward pressure on fertility
The organization knows that if they want young Americans to get married earlier, they’re going to have to attack women’s ability to obtain an education or enter the workforce at all. Which leads us to the next theme of “Saving America”…
Pushing Women Out of Public Life
Throughout the document, Heritage admonishes young people for prioritizing higher education and pursuing careers, quite literally disparaging the idea that young people should chase their passions and should instead procreate right-fucking-now. And while they often use gender-neutral language, the intent is clear. Especially when the authors share lines like this:
“The opportunity cost—that is, the number and perceived quality of activities or opportunities foregone if one has a family—has skyrocketed, especially for women. As the value of one’s alternatives—including career success, income potential, or leisure—rises, the more one must forgo to bear and raise children.”
And this, referring to young women, specifically:
“Since 1990, the median age of women at the time of the birth of their first child has increased by three years, from 27 to 30. This delay could be explained in part by increases in female college enrollment.”
While, at different turns, the Heritage Foundation seems to blame school, work, and ambition more broadly for supposedly declining fertility and marriage rates, they also cite research that suggests employment and “each additional hour of weekly labor per working-age adult” correlate with more births. In the same breath, the Heritage Foundation criticizes universal childcare and advocates for the government to support flexibility for working parents, but not through childcare programs. Instead, they want government grants for “home child care,” and more support for work-from-home options.
Taken together, their solution is to gut welfare programs, compelling more hours of work, and ‘encouraging’ women to stay home with their kids—driving young women out of schools, careers, and public life.
Especially telling? Heritage is critical of “over-credentialing”—that is, the growing demand for advanced degrees and professionalization to push ahead in one’s career. Instead, the group supports investments in apprenticeships and trade schools.
This isn’t a new refrain: In 2025, when Trump rolled out his disastrous tariffs, he claimed this would restore the ‘American Dream’ of good factory jobs for young people. Right-wing media personalities immediately got behind him. But Trump and the Heritage Foundation don’t want their kids on assembly lines or unclogging toilets. They want a gender-segregated world where young men and women marry and have kids as early as possible, men go to work, and women stay home with the babies they’re forced to birth.
Increasing the Birth Rate (For Some)
Speaking of those babies, let’s talk about pro-natalism and where Heritage stands on IVF and same-sex parents. (It’s exactly where you’d expect.)
Despite the organization’s obsession with the birth rate, their plan emphatically claims they aren’t “pro-natalist” but “pro-family.” Why? Because their position is aggressively anti-IVF and anti-LGBTQ families:
“Pro-family policy, by contrast [to pro-natalism], should reflect the value of all human beings as endowed by the Creator with inherent dignity from conception—and in particular, it should uphold the link between marriage and biological reality.”
The organization cites a bevy of decontextualized statistics that claim the U.S. is on the verge of civilizational collapse because people are having fewer kids—with language parallel to the white supremacist Great Replacement Theory, claiming that “fertility rates in the United States dropped below replacement level in the early 1970s and have remained below that threshold nearly every year since.”
For those who are opting against having children, their reasons are fairly obvious—like, say, abortion bans. Pregnancy is more dangerous than it’s ever been in recent history, and prenatal and reproductive care is sparse as OBGYNs flee anti-abortion states.
Their proposed solution? More cuts to the social safety net! Heritage rails against welfare for supposedly making low-income women less likely to marry. The plan all but spells out that the only way to compel more women to pursue marriage and childbearing as early as possible is to take away all their other options.
“Fertility rates tend to be higher in less-developed countries, but as nations industrialize, several factors conspire to reduce birth rates. These include the proliferation of birth control, more prospects for women to receive higher education and work outside the home, the delayed financial independence of young adults, and the government’s role in old-age Social Security.”
The short of it? They want to drag us backward.
But the implicit and, at times, explicit disclaimer to their demand for more babies? They only want this from some of us. Not from single mothers or women on welfare, who are implicitly coded as women of color. And not from LGBTQ couples, or couples or individuals who are struggling with infertility, as IVF and other fertility technology “denies a right due to every child conceived—to be born and grow in relationship with his or her mother and father bound in marriage.”
Heritage even appears to shade the likes of Elon Musk, criticizing “…mass subsidies for IVF, egg freezing, and genetic screening combined with a market for babies where people (usually men of means) contractually create many children across many partners or surrogates.”
Instead of supporting IVF, Heritage boosts so-called Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM) to “diagnose and treat the root causes of infertility.” (RRM is more or less the latest MAHA trend: the idea that women don’t really need IVF, but to fix their nutrition and hormone imbalances.) The group calls for insurance coverage of RRM and additional state-funded research.
While we’re all for everyone having as many options available to them as possible to control their reproductive lives, the only reason the anti-abortion movement has embraced RRM is to hide their attacks on IVF—and their efforts to codify fetal personhood.
Targeting Young People
Large swaths of Heritage’s 250-year plan are dedicated to analyzing the ambitions and behaviors of young people—including their dating lives, online dating culture, social media, porn consumption, and the ‘sexual revolution.’
It’s hard to keep a straight face as the same ghouls who want the government to track our periods lecture us about romance and relationships. The group even disparages the idea of ‘soulmates’ or waiting to marry or have kids with someone you love—instead egging us on to couple up immediately out of a sense of “duty and virtue.”
It’s extremely pointed that the Heritage Foundation’s 250-year plan focuses this much on young people—at the same time that conservative or conservative-adjacent influencers are thriving in digital spaces right now. And it’s hard not to find these efforts disturbing: The right wants young people—no matter how young, apparently—to marry and have kids immediately.
The GOP has long targeted state funding for teen pregnancy prevention programs, fearmongered about declining fertility and even sperm motility (ew) rates in young peopleIf the baby crazy repugs are concerned about sperm, they need to ban frac’ing (many of the chemicals used wreck sperm) and use protection during pandemics (COVID also wrecks sperm, even more so than frac’ing) … all at the same time our GOP president ties to a prolific child sex trafficker are continuously further exposed.
Since the 2024 election, we’ve all been forced to learn about the “manosphere”—the universe of bro-y, overtly misogynistic influencers like Joe Rogan, Andrew Tate, and Adin Ross, who have spent years reeling in young men with seemingly apolitical content about weightlifting and dating. But there’s also the pink pill pipeline, which Jessica has written about extensively, and the womanosphere: Young women are also being radicalized in digital spaces, lured by seemingly apolitical content—about celebrity gossip, “natural” birth control, “clean girl” aesthetics, and dating.
Other popular influencers—catering to both young men and young women—rail against porn for a variety of reasons. Misogynist influencers like Andrew Tate, for instance, tell young men that porn makes them weak and easily controlled by lust. Their talking points closely reflect those laid out by the Heritage Foundation.fucking religion. Cruel hideous hate-farming abuse-farming religion. Worst thing to ever happen to women and kids
This content has become a chilling pipeline to persuade young women that our rights to abortion, contraception—even to vote or own bank accounts—were all a mistake. Billionaire-backed, anti-feminist women’s media outlets and viral female lifestyle influencers are increasingly shaping young women’s politics, too: just look at Peter Thiel’s Evie Magazine, which routinely churns out articles about celebrity gossip that in turn glorify traditional gender roles trans, gay, bi, etc, have always existed, are natural in our species and many others. “Traditional gender roles” are not natural. They were fabricated by religious misogynistic men, mostly ignorant abusive religious assholes wanting free labour, sex machines and baby makers (with which to exploit sexually and to make more money) and demonize feminismbecause male humans, especially religious ones, hate sharing their power with anyone but other men, best if those other men rape women and kids too.
The timing of this seemingly organic digital cultural shift against female birth control, against sexual freedom, against feminism broadly, is no coincidence. We’re being primed to accept a slate of violent, dehumanizing legislative attacks on our bodily autonomy.
Conservatives are simultaneously trying to create a policy landscape where women rely on marriage and homemaking because nothing else is available to us—and a culture where we embrace this.
Using their 250-year plan against them
Like Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation’s 250-year plan is a map: It spells out not just policy positions and recommendations, but sweeping explanations about their motivations, strategies, and approach to propagandizing and conditioning us to accept fascism. It’s terrifying—but like Project 205, in a way, it’s also a tool in our toolbox. When we know what they’re fighting for, and how they’re fighting for it, we’re better equipped to prepare and fight back.
The anti-abortion and broader conservative movement knows their cause is unpopular. The only tools in their arsenal are deceit: lying about the safety of abortion, misrepresenting their abortion bans or passing backdoor bans, undermining elections, scapegoating trans people, sowing fear and bigotry, claiming to care about the safety of women and children while enabling a president accused of egregious sex crimes.
Heritage has planted their flag and laid out in excruciating, hideous detail exactly how far backward they want to take us, our daughters, and our granddaughters. That means you’ll start to see these demands and messages percolating across not just conservative spaces, but probably other online and cultural spaces you aren’t expecting.
They don’t want us to know who they are or their plans for us. That’s why exposing them has never been more important.
Jane Davis Feb 12:
I am so grateful for you and Jessica’s work Kylie. I can’t find the words to express my horror.I’ve lived most of my life in horror and terror at what men, notably religious cons, want to do to the rights, bodies, and lives of girls and women. Heinous evil fuckers, using religious texts (written by men, likely rape-loving kid-raping drunks) controlled and edited by men (raping catholic church) to abuse kids and women.
Kara Feb 13:
I am curious how they’re going to convince the masses (of women) that less rights is better after the Epstein files exposed how men continue to use women and girls as a form of currency. The only thing worse than reading their insane delusions is knowing they are so fucking stupidYa, like ultra stupid Pee Pee and his bible thumping Trump wannabe Cons, separatist Smith and UCP and the Alberta separatists
Marcy Feb 12:
War against women. Two fold The global sex trade and the Heritage Foundation. Heritage is focused on subservience and seeking to make it legal via laws. Sex traffickers operate via coercion and illegal possession of people. One type has legal status the other illegal. Power and Control. The parallel is disturbing.
Both entities treat women and children as property.
Kay-El Feb 12:
- Forced marriage, forced birth and no way out sounds like a rather draconian “plan” (translation: punishment) for being born a woman.driven by religion’s hate of women and girls.
- Even No-fault divorce is not easy, no divorce is, unless perhaps you have no children or assets. I didn’t have to step a foot in court, but I had reams of paperwork, a parenting plan to create and a six month wait for it to be final. I guarantee I changed my underwear more times during that period than I did husbands. I’ve never remarried.
Cathy Wray Feb 13:
The Heritage Foundation knows that women don’t NEED men, and that infuriates them!!
Jan M. Flynn Feb 12:
They’re determined to enfold all of us in their sick, impossible fantasy — and our daughters and granddaughters, for generations to come. Monstrous.
Andra Watkins Feb 12:
Bravo for calling out the Christian Nationalist extremism at the heart of this screed.
Wendy Wolfson Feb 12:
Actually this sounds a lot like present day Afghanistan
Ethereal Fairy Feb 15:
Religion is at the base of both.
Runfastandwin Feb 12:
lemme just say, these people are monsters. also they got a lot of gall given they support the serial rapist and adulterer tangeranus unequivocally.He’s their perfect leader; he’s what they want for all “christian” men, to be able to rape boys and girls and women, and murder some, and commit after-birth murder of babies he produced via raping a girl, etc., and. always get away with it. That’s why Todd Blanche is now AG, to strip away rights from girls and women across the country, including taking away consent. Fucking ghastly, and unfortunately, I fear horrid misogynist Mark Carney, another catholic, is all in, which is why he invited monster Kevin Roberts up to train his fucking cabinet. I remain aghast every day, how slickly Carney has conned Canadians.
Cathy Wray Feb 13:
oh, how true!! All women and girls should be in the street protesting!!! OMG, I’m so furious!!
Runfastandwin Feb 13:
Fury is really the only appropriate response…
Carol O’Neill Feb 12:
The vermin at the Heritage Foundation are sll gung ho about stripping women of all resources to force us into slavery, but they ALSO want to keep wages at the level of federal minimum. It takes zero imagination to see how that would work.
That’s one rock-solid fact we can use against them. Anybody else got ideas for countering these pigs?
Cathy Wray Feb 13:
They really are pigs. This whole goddamn patriarchy is disgusting!! Teach your daughters well. I don’t have children, and I’m so glad at this time in a maddening world.Only thing I did right in my life, was choose not to have any kids.
LM Holt Feb 13:
Is anyone suing the HF yet? I’m not a lawyer, but given that almost all (if not all) of the HF’s agenda is antithetical to the US Constitution, aren’t there solid grounds for a variety of lawsuits, including treason? Asking the internet about US Treason laws gives this: “Treason in the United States is defined by the Constitution as either levying war against the U.S. or adhering to its enemies by providing aid and comfort.” By pushing for laws that limit the rights of people according to gender, sexual orientation, melanin levels, etc., they are effectively ‘levying war’ against the majority of US citizens. Not to mention the ‘adhering to its enemies’ thing! (Putin’s puppet.)
Carol O’Neill Feb 12:
Another thing we can do is HAMMER the right about Epstein, bis customers, and the victim’s.
@call634-5789.bsky.social:
TMYK: Epstein would bring in little girls, Fat Donnie would auction them off…with proof. My thanks to Greg T.
Read entire .pdf of events here:
www.justice.gov/epstein/file…
Ask your self how the hell is it possible fat Donnie is NOT in the deepest hole in a windowless prison.
Makes me sick.
@hardciderblues.bsky.social:
And protected by Republicans
Republicans come in three categories:
PEDOPHILE – more and more are qualifying daily under this category
PEDOPHILE FRIENDLY – those who actively cover for Pedophiles
PEDOPHILE ENABLER – those who still support and offer aid and comfort to pedophiles
@tbwagp.bsky.social:
I don’t recall who originated it but I’m a firm believer in the theory that everything Trump does can be understood as a form of rape. Tariffs? Rape. Greenland and Canada? Rape. ICE deployments? Rape.
He loves rape so much he cannot conceive of equal exchange/mutual benefit. You give and he takes.
