New study: Polar bear visits to human infrastructure increase with sea ice loss, not poor body condition.

New paper just dropped. I helped out a bit.Polar bear visits to human infrastructure increase with sea ice loss, not poor body condition.cdnsciencepub.com/doi/abs/10.1…

Ryan Brook, PhD. Chairman of the Boar (@ryankbrook.bsky.social) 2026-01-12T22:28:51.147Z

Polar bear visits to human infrastructure increase with sea ice loss, not poor body condition by Danielle Rivet, Ryan Brook, Alex Crawford, Corey Kramer, Michel P. Laforge, Julienne Stroeve, and Douglas Andrew Clark, Jan 12, 2026, Arctic Science, Canadian Science Publishing

https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2025-0031

Abstract

Climate warming has reduced Arctic sea ice, forcing some populations of polar bears (Ursus maritimus Phipps 1774) to spend more time on land and increasing the potential for encounters with humans. We recorded 580 polar bear visits to four sites along western Hudson Bay from 2011 to 2021 using remote cameras, assessing the influence of sea ice phenology, body condition, and human activity on visitation frequency. Our results show that the length of the ice-free season predicts polar bear visits to onshore infrastructure, while neither poor body condition nor human presence significantly affect the bears’ visitation rates. These findings suggest that sea ice loss governs the likelihood of polar bear-human interactions, but nutritional stress does not drive polar bears toward human sites. Consequently, we infer that body condition may influence whether interactions escalate into conflicts rather than their initial occurrence. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for managing risks to both bears and people amid ongoing Arctic environmental change. Agreement between our observations of bear demographics, and to a lesser extent body condition, with concurrent mark-recapture studies suggests that remote cameras may be useful for monitoring the ecology of polar bear sub-populations that spend time on land.

View PDF

Refer also to:

Why is it taboo to say humanity’s “over population” is wiping out life on earth? Religion, ego (thinking we’re superior to all) and NGOs (controlled opposition) will never permit humans to reduce baby making and greed. More babies makes their careers, fills their pay checks, and makes the rich richer and provides more kids for them to rape.

Another study shows air pollution (caused by human greed and over population) is causing devastating forms of dementia. No wonder the world is filling with Fucker Truckers and MAGAts.

New Study: Aspergillus gearing up to get us via climate change, thanks to human pollution and over population.

Life’s future under humanity’s inhumanity, greed, selfishness (over population), and pollution-induced climate chaos: Starvation for us and other species. “The future increasingly features catastrophes that have never been recorded before”

New review: What’s destroying life on earth? Human overpopulation. Having 1 less child is 50 times more effective in reducing individual carbon footprints than other actions. “With human numbers doubling on Earth between 1970 and 2020, demand for freshwater resources for domestic use increased globally by 600%” while frac’ers permanently remove from the hydrogeological cycle 25-100% of the water they inject. “Re-fracturing may take place up to four times” on individual wells.

This entry was posted in Global Frac News. Bookmark the permalink.