CAPE responds to Canadian government approving Pacific NW LNG Media Release by CAPE, September 28, 2016
Vancouver: The Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) is deeply disappointed to learn that the federal cabinet has chosen to approve construction of the Pacific North West LNG (PNW LNG) processing facility on Lelu Island. This $36 billion project will take methane gas – extracted by extensive fracking operations in northeastern BC and transported by pipeline across the province to the coast – and liquefy it for transportation across the Pacific Ocean to buyers in Asia and elsewhere.
Proceeding with the Pacific Northwest LNG facility will act as an incentive for massive expansion of fracking operations in northeastern BC.
This approval comes just weeks after over 180 physicians, medical students, and other health professionals wrote an open letter to the Federal Ministers of Health, the Environment, and Indigenous and Northern Affairs asking them to reject the PNW LNG project until its human health impacts had been fully understood, communicated, and addressed.
“We are extremely disappointed by the decision of our federal government supporting this project,” offered CAPE member Dr. Larry Barzelai, a family physician from Vancouver. “As Canadians, we were so proud of our government when it committed to a global warming target of 1.5 degrees rather than the 2.0 degrees agreed to by most other countries. We thought that our new government would take climate change seriously but decisions such as this make it appear that they are simply paying lip service to this important issue.”
“The human and environmental health effects of fracking, on which LNG is based, have recently been shown to be far more grave than the federal or provincial governments have acknowledged,” said CAPE co-founding Board member Dr. Warren Bell, a family physician in Salmon Arm.
“The vast majority of the public health studies directed at fracking have identified red flags.”
“This project alone will make it essentially impossible for BC to meet its own climate targets,” said CAPE Board member Dr. Courtney Howard. “The World Health Organization describes climate change as the biggest health threat of the 21st century. In Canada, we are already seeing the health effects of climate change with the spread of Lyme Disease, high temperatures in the South, an increasing number of wildfires, and dangerously decreased ice stability in the North.”
CAPE also believes that the utmost care must be taken to honour the right of Aboriginal people to health and to full, prior, and informed consent with respect to development on their traditional lands. This project does not meet that requirement.
CAPE office: (416) 306-2273 ext. 1
Reject Pacific Northwest LNG Project until Health Impact Assessment is conducted! Media Release by Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE), September 13, 2016
131 Physicians, medical residents, allied health professionals and health advocates have signed an open letter requesting that the Federal Cabinet reject the Pacific Northwest Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project until its human health impacts have been fully understood, communicated, and addressed. …
The Canadian Medical Association supports a comprehensive federal environmental review
process, including health impact studies, for all industrial projects.
This year, the Canadian Medical Association additionally passed a resolution at its General Council stating that it “supports incorporating full-cost accounting, including greenhouse gas emissions and water-usage impacts, into health-impact assessments for projects involving hydraulic fracturing for unconventional oil and gas reserves.”
The Pacific NW LNG project has not had a comprehensive health impact assessment. The open letter states, “This is a grave omission that, in our opinion, negates the ability of this review to determine whether or not the project is in the public interest.”
Three main areas of concern exist with regards to human health:
1 – Climate-health impacts: Climate change is the biggest global health threat of the 21st century, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). The Pacific NW LNG project would make it virtually impossible for BC to meet its climate targets.
2 – Local health impacts secondary to hydraulic fracturing associated with the project: The evidence base around hydraulic fracturing has completely changed over the past 3 years. Over 80% of public health studies show red flags.
3 – Health impacts on directly-affected Aboriginal populations: The density of development required to complete this project, and the lack of control afforded to local populations creates a strong likelihood of negative impacts on traditional ways of life and consequent physical health impacts and psychological distress.
“We are at a crossroads. Either we pollute our air, put our water supplies at risk, and change our climate in dramatic and unpredictable ways, or we work towards a world in which our children have a chance of a cleaner, healthier future. Fracking and LNG are linked—we should really be talking about “FrackLNG” and asking ourselves if that’s the future we want.” Dr. Laurence Barzelai, CAPE member, Vancouver physician.
Over 80% of the studies that have ever been conducted into shale and tight gas development have been done since 2013. A recent systematic assessment of the peer-reviewed scientific literature (2009-2015) found that “84% of public health studies contain findings that indicate public health hazards, elevated risks, or adverse health outcomes; 69% of water quality studies contain findings that indicate potential, positive association, or actual incidence of water contamination; and 87% of air quality studies contain findings that indicate elevated air pollutant emissions and/or atmospheric concentrations.” Hays J, Shonkoff SB. Toward an Understanding of the Environmental and Public Health Impacts of Unconventional Natural Gas Development: A Categorical Assessment of
the Peer-Reviewed Scientific Literature, 2009-2015. PloS one. 2016;11(4):e0154164.
Dear Ministers McKenna, Philpott and Bennett:
We are writing to you as physicians, medical learners, allied health professionals and health advocates to request that you reject the Pacific Northwest Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) Project until its human health impacts have been fully understood, communicated, and addressed.
It is our understanding that the evaluation conducted by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency for the proposed Pacific Northwest LNG Project that would process natural gas transported from Progress Energy’s horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing operations in Northeastern BC and Northwest Alberta does not include full consideration of its potential impact on human health. If some aspects of this have been done, they have not been well-communicated to communities. This is a grave omission that, in our opinion, negates the ability of this review to determine whether or not the project is in the public interest. Given this, and the potentially significant impacts that this project may have on human health globally as a result of its contribution to climate change, and locally as result of the direct impacts of hydraulic fracturing operations (fracking), we believe that the project must not go forward.
First, this project contradicts the spirit and terms of the Paris Agreement which references the need to protect the “right to health” and to hold the increase in average global surface temperatures well below two degrees Celsius.
Projections of the amount of CO2 equivalents produced by the Pacific Northwest LNG project show that the project is not compatible with BC’s or Canada’s climate goals. Estimates range from the Government of BC’s 3.7 million tonnes of CO2e per year – which includes only Phase 1 of the project, as opposed to the complete project which you are being asked to approve – to between 11.7-13.9 Mt CO2e/year when upstream emissions estimates are added to the proponent’s estimates by Environment and Climate Change Canada. The Pembina Institute recently updated its estimate in light of BC’s new climate plan to 9.6-10.5 Mt CO2e by 2050. Given that BC’s 2050 target for the entire economy is 13 million tonnes of CO2e per year, even the Government of BC’s unrealistically conservative estimate of 3.7 Mt CO2e/year means that this project alone could consume (3.7/13)x100= 28 per cent of BC’s 2050 carbon budget. The other estimates suggests that this project alone would consume most of BC’s 2050 carbon budget. As was communicated to you in May in a letter signed by 90 climate scientists, this project would make it virtually impossible for BC to meet its climate targets. This would prevent BC from taking advantage of what the Lancet in 2015 called the greatest health opportunity of our time—tackling climate change.
The threat posed to human health by the changing climate is so severe that the World Health Organization calls it the “greatest threat to global health of the 21st century” and calculates that, between 2030 and 2050, at least 250,000 additional people worldwide will die prematurely every year as a result of climate change from malnutrition, heat stress, diarrhea and malaria alone. The second Lancet Commission on Climate Change pointed out that “The effects of climate change are being felt today, and future projections represent an unacceptably high and potentially catastrophic risk to human health.”
In Canada, we are already experiencing health impacts from climate change. The Chief Public Health Officer of Canada has stated: “Climate change can exacerbate many existing health concerns and present new risks to the health of Canadians.” In particular we are seeing an increase in severe wildfires causing a sharply increased respiratory health burden and stressful evacuations; an increased spread of Lyme disease, and mental health and food security impacts secondary to rapid landscape changes in Canada’s rapidly-warming arctic regions, amongst other impacts. On a broader scale, climate-related drought has contributed to the conflict in Syria with its consequent disastrous loss of life and challenging international refugee flows. As warming accelerates beyond the 2 degree C target, basic human needs will increasingly not be met, and health care systems will themselves be affected The Canadian Medical Association recognized the importance of climate change this year by making it a key topic of its annual General Council. We cannot afford to fail to meet our climate targets.
Second, in direct local terms, there is a rapidly mounting body of evidence which suggests that significant local health impacts are associated with hydraulic fracturing. This field of study has been transformed over the past 3 years: over 80% of the peer-reviewed scientific studies have been published since January 1st, 2013, and the vast majority contain red flags. A recent systematic assessment of the peer-reviewed scientific literature (2009-2015) concluded that “84% of public health studies contain findings that indicate public health hazards, elevated risks, or adverse health outcomes; 69% of water quality studies contain findings that indicate potential, positive association, or actual incidence of water contamination; and 87% of air quality studies contain findings that indicate elevated air pollutant emissions and/or atmospheric concentrations.”
Specific concerns for human health include the endocrine disrupting properties of fracking fluids, increased asthma rates among those who live near fracking operations, contamination of groundwater resources, and potential impacts on fetal development, A recent study evaluated more than 1000 chemicals commonly used in hydraulic-fracturing fluids and wastewater for potential reproductive and developmental toxicity. For 76% of these chemicals, no toxicological data were available. Of the remaining substances, 43% and 40% of them were associated with reproductive and developmental toxicity in humans, respectively.
Access to adequate amounts of healthy water is a clear determinant of health and this project poses a real risk to water resources. The volume of water required is extremely large: Pembina Institute estimates 5.1 million m3 in 2030. This, combined with the recent finding from the first comprehensive study of groundwater to be carried out in the Peace River area, that “the groundwater regime has been very poorly monitored and is still very poorly monitored,” is cause for real concern.
The study is a large file, takes time to load.
The water study, presented to the Peace River Regional District Board in Dawson Creek on August 25th, additionally comments, “there is a profound absence of knowledge about the presence and migration of fluids in the intermediate zone of the subsurface, approximately located between 500 m and 2 km depth. This needs to be addressed in the areas of intense oil and gas activities. Adequate characterization and monitoring programs need to be designed and implemented very rapidly.” To approve a project involving toxic chemicals of largely unstudied effects on human health in the face of such inadequate monitoring of water resources would be reckless.
Recognizing developing concerns around both climate-related health problems and the health impacts of hydraulic fracturing, in August, the Canadian Medical Association passed a motion at its General Council stating, “The Canadian Medical Association supports incorporating full-cost accounting, including greenhouse gas emissions and water-usage impacts, into health-impact assessments for projects involving hydraulic fracturing for unconventional oil and gas reserves. “ To our knowledge, this has not been done for this project or those associated with it.
Finally, the degree of industrial development involved in the fulfillment of this project, and the lack of consensus as to its overall benefit for directly affected populations, particularly in some Aboriginal communities, is likely to lead to changes in traditional ways of life and “solastalgia,” a term given to the intense psychological distress caused by landscape change so rapid that people begin to feel homesick while still at home. The Pembina Institute estimates that the new gas well activity required to supply the project would peak at 842 wells drilled in 2020. The Blueberry River First Nations (BRFN) petition requesting that the province of BC quash its royalty agreement regarding this project shows that directly-affected populations continue to have concerns. The BRFN petition states “The infrastructure development required by the long term royalty agreement and planned by Progress Energy would cause serious harm to Blueberry Rivers First Nations territory and treaty rights…It would destroy, fragment, pollute and otherwise disturb thousands of acres of animal habitat.” Solastalgia has been shown to be worse when people have a feeling of a lack of control over rapid change, as is clearly the case for at least some members of the population directly affected by this project.
In the year in which Canada signed the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and following the release of the Truth and Reconciliation report – the utmost care must be taken to honour the right of Aboriginal people to health, and to full, prior and informed consent with respect to development of their traditional lands.
British Columbia’s First Nation’s Health Authority (‘FNHA’) recently made clear the strong links between First Nations, the land and resources, culture and associated health outcomes in the initial findings of the Mount Polley Health Impact Assessment. The FNHA report confirms that:
“The Aboriginal population in Canada is vulnerable to changes in environmental and socioeconomic conditions stemming from resource development projects. This vulnerability is primarily due to their physical, mental, spiritual, and emotional connections to traditional land and natural resources. And it is underpinned by a history of adverse cultural impacts of colonialism and subsequent assimilation practices spanning more than 150 years.”
The FNHA report affirmed that protection of First Nations from environmental dispossession requires protection of the health of ecosystems in an integrated manner. Failure to do so represents a breach of trust which can be expected to negatively impact efforts at reconciliation.
Overall, urgent concerns exist with regards to both the global and the local health impacts of this project. These risks have not been adequately investigated, communicated or addressed. We urge you to consider the following motion, passed in 2012 at the Canadian Medical Association General Council: “The Canadian Medical Association supports a comprehensive federal environmental review process, including health impact studies, for all industrial projects.” (DM 5-29)
Until stakeholders understand the risks that hydraulic fracturing poses to their health, and steps have been taken to mitigate or eliminate them, no new projects which increase the level of hydraulic fracturing in BC, or in Canada as a whole, should proceed.
Climate-health needs to be recognized as a health emergency and must be addressed with the same attention to targets and time windows as is applied during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and thrombolysis for myocardial infarction. There is no worse feeling than losing a patient because a resuscitation happens too slowly—and no better feeling than pulling a patient from a spiral of physiologic dysfunction with timely intervention. Let our experience at the bedside inform our joint success here. Greenhouse gas emissions need to be included in health impact assessments and projects must be evaluated in the context of other projects proposed, with the goal of staying within overall carbon budget targets. Over 80% of economic fossil fuel reserves must remain in the ground, including most Canadian unconventional oil and gas reserves. Nature, unfortunately, does not accept half measures.
Opinion surveys consistently show that health is a top concern of Canadians. As we increasingly understand the pivotal impact that the social and ecological determinants of health have on overall health, we must acknowledge that to consider one without the other leaves the major part of the story untold. Last year the Canadian Public Health Association published a discussion document on the health impacts of global ecological change to assist with this.(28) An incomplete assessment of a project with the potential for causing extreme harm is simply not acceptable.
Christiana Figueres, former head of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, told the world’s health ministers in May at the World Health Assembly that, “We have five years to make an extraordinary difference.” As healthcare providers, we share with you, our decision-makers, the prime responsibility for the stewardship of our nation’s health during this critical time period. A new era of best practice is required, and should begin with the rejection of the Pacific Northwest Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) Project until its human health impacts have been fully understood, communicated, and addressed. [Emphasis added]
Dr Courtney Howard, MD, CCFP-EM, Climate-Health Board Lead, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE). Emergency Physician, Yellowknife
Dr Trevor Hancock, Hon FFPH, Professor and Senior Scholar, School of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria. Senior Editor, Canadian Journal of Public Health
Dr R.Warren Bell BA MDCM CCFP FCFP(LM), Past Founding President, CAPE Rural Preceptor, University of BC, Salmon Arm, BC
Dr Lawrence Barzelai, MD, CCFP, BC Lead-CAPE, Clinical Preceptor, University of BC
Dr Margaret J McGregor, MD, MHSc ,Clinical Associate Professor & Director of Community Geriatrics,UBC Department of Family Practice, Research Scientist, VCHRI Centre for Clinical Epidemiology & Evaluation
Dr Melissa Lem, MD, CCFP, University of British Columbia Department of Family Practice
Carl Severson, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Medical Student
Dr Tim K. Takaro, MD, MPH, MS, Professor and Chair, Masters and PhD Committee, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University
Dr Darcy Scott, MD, FRCPC, Pediatrics, Yellowknife
Cathy Vakil MD, CCFP, FCFP
Thomas L. Perry, MD, FRCPC
Dr.Caroline Kowal,MD,CCFP-EM Emergency physician,Winnipeg
Dr John O’Connor MD
Megan Oakey, MPH
BC Provincial Health Services Authority
Sarah Giles, MD, CCFP(EM), DMT&H
Kelly Lau, McGill University, Medical Student
Dr. Alan Ruddiman, MB.BCh. FRRMS, Dip. PEMP (SFU)
Rural Generalist Physician, Oliver, BC
Mark Polle, MD, CCFP, Red Lake, ON
Danyaal Raza, MD MPH CCFP
Dr. Rebecca Psutka, MD, MSc, Family Medicine Resident Physician
Dr. Amy Anne Lubik, BSc, PhD, BC-CAPE
Yassen Tcholakov, MD MIH
Tandi Wilkinson MD
Dr. Erica Frank, MD, MPH, FACPM; Professor and Canada Research Chair in Preventive Medicine and Population Health, University of British Columbia; Past-President, Physicians for Social Responsibility
Elaine Golds, Ph.D.
Jeremy J Leveque, PhD candidate
Nancy Furness PhD (UBC)
Bruce Brandhorst, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus of Molecular Biology, Simon Fraser University
Paola Ardiles MHSc MBA (candidate), Lecturer Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University
Svetoslav Gueordjev MD
Edith MacHattie, B.SC, M.OT
Community pediatrics, Surrey BC
Dr. Kate Tairyan, MD, MPH
Senior Lecturer and Adjunct Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University
Director of Public Health, NextGenU.org
Larry Dobson MD CCFP
Dr. Vahe Arakelyan, MD
Chris Carlsten, MD MPH
Associate Professor of Medicine
University of British Columbia
Dr Makere Stewart-Harawira, Professor, Global, Environmental and Indigenous Studies, University of Alberta
Dr AnneMarie Pegg, MD, CCFP(EM)
Dr. Ryan Herriot, MD, CCFP
Dr. Rita McCracken, MD, CCFP, PhD(c)
Dr. Laara Banner, MD, CCFP
Leena Hasan, MPH
Dr. Christopher Stewart, MD, FRCPC
Dr. Pamela Kryskow, MD, CCFP
Dr Lisa Sawyer, MD, CCFP
Michael Irvine, MD, FRCPC
Dr. Gary Bota MD FRCPC Section Chair Emergency Medicine NOSM
Melissa Bota, MD, Psychiatry PGY-2 UBC
Dr. Aldrich J Leung
Dr. Duncan Etches, Professor, Dept of FP, UBC
Dr. Maja Stachura MD, FRCPC, Emergency Medicine
JoyAnne Krupa MD BScN
Dr. Nora Etches, MD, CCFP
Dr. Lise Loubert
Sarah Siddiqui, MSW, RSW
Marguerite Heyns, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Medical Student
Colin L. Soskolne, PhD, Professor emeritus, University of Alberta; Adjunct Professor, Health Research Institute, University of Canberra, Australia
Monika Dutt, Public Health and Preventive Medicine Specialist, Family Physician, Wagmatcook First Nation
Emma Burns, MD, FRCPC
Robert F Woollard MD CCFP FCFP
Professor, Faculty of Medicine
University of British Columbia
Sherilee L Harper, MSc, PhD
Dr. Ann Borda, CHIA, Health informatics; Researcher, Climate and Health Alliance; Honorary Fellow, Health and Biomedical Informatics, University of Melbourne
Dr. Reta Kutsche, MD CCFP
Dr. Jane Cox, MD CCFP
Dr. Tonja Stothart, B.Sc., B.Ed., MD
Claudel P-Desrosiers, Medical Student (University of Montreal)
Djamila Saad, Medical Student (McGill University)
Aline D. Khatchikian, Medical Student (Laval University)
Gershon Growe,MD. (Prof.Emeritus,UBC)
Anne-Lou McNeil-Gauthier, Medical Student (University of Sherbrooke)
James Wright, MD, PhD, FRCP(C)
Daniel Rosenbaum, MD, Psychiatry PGY-2 University of Toronto
Dr Maya K. Gislason, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University
Meg Sears PhD
Dr. Lewis Pullmer MD FRCPC
Greg Linton MD., CCFP.
Nitasha Puri, MD, CCFP
Dr. Jean Zigby, MDCM, CCFP(PC)
Sue Turgeon MD, CCFP
Vikhashni Nagesh, MS2
Rachel McGhee MD, CCFP
Fahreen Dossa MD CCFP DTM&H
Liam Brunham, MD, PhD, FRCPC
Carolyn J McGhee MB BS
Nardia Strydom, MB ChB
Dept Head Family & Community Medicine, Providence Health Care
Clinical Assistant Professor, Dept Medicine, UBC
Paddy McCluskey, MD
Christy Sutherland MD CCFP dABAM Clinical Assistant Professor, University of British Columbia, Department of Family Medicine
Renee Fernandez, MD, CCFP
Marianne Rev, MD CCFP FCFP
Karen Buhler MD, CCFP
Charles King MD
Clinical Assistant Professor, Faculty of Medicine
University of British Columbia
Vicky Tong, MD, CCFP
Julie Martz, MD, CCFP
Philip A. Muir, MD, CCFP, FCFP
Curtis Lavoie MD CCFP (EM)
Linda Knox, RM
joan rosenberg, B.Sc. M.D.
Dr Blake Poland, PhD, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
Bill Mackie Clinical Professor,Past Chair Environmental Health BCMA Counsel on Health Promotion
Neasa Coll, MD, CCFP
Trevor Janz MD Regional Residential Care Medical Director for Interior Health East
Val Embree, MSc (Health Services Planning)
Michelle Linekin, MD — Vancouver family physician
Gail Mountain Business Owner
Dr. Caroline Eberdt, MA, MD, CCFP-EM
Adrianne Ross PhD MD CCFP
Patricia Schwartz MD, FRCP (C)
Paola Ardiles (PHABC President)
Kim McGrail, PhD (health services research at UBC)
Douglas Graeb MD, FRCPC, Professor Emeritus, UBC
Dr. Joanne Young MD
John LAST, OC, MD, DPH, FRCPC, etc
School of Public Health, University of Ottawa
Gabriela Glattstein-Young, MD, MPH
Dr Danielle Marentette, MD CCFP
Dr. Vanessa Brcic MD CCFP
Dr. Karen Stancer, MD CCFP
Dr. Sarah Olson, MD, CCFP
Dr. Janessa Laskin, MD FRCPC; Medical Oncologist
Dr. Rodica Janz, BSc, MD, CCFP
Carolyn Hall MD, CCFP
Sylvia Makaroff, BSc, MD, FCFP
Dr. Evelyn Cornelissen, RD, PhD (clinical assistant professor in family medicine, health services and policy researcher)
George Deagle , M.D.
Jackie Mann, MD – R1 UofC
Dr. Haseena Majeed
Robin Fowler, business owner
Dr. Kevin McKechnie, MD, CCFP
Dr Rupinder Brar MD CCFP
Leala Wong, RN
Beverly Spring, MD MCFP(PC)
Dr. Joel Bluman, MD, UBC Family Medicine Resident
Dr Jade Dittaro, MD, CCFP
Clinical Instructor and Site Faculty – Curriculum, UBC Rural Okanagan Family Medicine Residency Program, Kelowna, BC
John M Last, OC, MD, DPH, FRCPC
Jennifer Kuhl, Campaigner, BC Health Coalition
Ashlee Cunsolo, Canada Research Chair in Determinants of Healthy Communities & Associate Professor of Community Health
Craig Orr, Ph.D., Conservation Advisor, Watershed Watch Salmon Society
Eleonora Molnar, Health Planner
Leta Zaleski, RDH, MEd.
Tikicia Joyce, 3rd Year BsN Student, UBCO
Alexander Frame, MD, MHSc
Instructor/Tutor UBC FOM
Victoria Barr, MHSc PhD(c)
Kathleen McLean, BASc MPH
Malcolm Steinberg, MD Chair MPH Program, FHS, SFU
Ashok Krishnamurthy, MD CM CCFP dip ABAM, Adjunct Lecturer, University of Toronto
Dr. Sandra Allison, CCFP FRCPC (Public Health and Preventive Medicine)
Marjorie MacDonald, RN, PhD
Professor, School of Nursing
University of Victoria
Jessica Stanley, PhD
Sheila Paul, Dip CRIM, University of Vancouver Island
Sue Pollock MSc, MD, FRCPC
Donna Warrender, RN, BScN
Raelene Foisy, MD, R1 Obs/gyne, Winnipeg
Melody Monro, MPA
Cheryl Van Vliet-Brown, RN, BSN, BSc(Ecol)
Raina Fumerton, MPH, MD, FRCPC
Alysha McFadden MSc, BSN, RN, CCHN(c)
Ritika Goel, MD MPH CCFP, Lecturer, University of Toronto
Shari Laliberte R.N., M.N., Ph.d., Vancouver Community College
Andrew Gray, MD MSc FRCPC
David Kaiser, MD Msc FRCPC,
Clinical Assistant Professor,
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health,
Sarah-Amelie Mercure, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Catherine Habel, MD, R4 (Public Health and Preventive Medicine)
Colleen Fuller, MD MSc CCFP FRCPC
Dr.Mark-Andrew Stefan, BSc, MD, MSc, FRCPC
Médecin spécialiste en santé publique et médecine préventive
Chargé d’enseignement clinique
Département de médecine sociale et préventive
École de santé publique de l’Université de Montréal
Sidonie Pénicaud, MD MSc, R4 McGill University
Kelly McNabb RN, BScN, MPH (Public Health Nurse-Fraser Health)
Sarah-Emilie Racine, MD, R2 (Public Health and Preventive Medicine), University of Montreal)
Richard Fachehoun, MD MSc, R5 (Public health and preventive medicine) Laval University
Sarah Beck, BSN, RN (PHN)
Danielle Munnion, RN, BScN
Public Health Nurse, ages 0-5
Vancouver Coastal Health
Breann Specht, MSc (Population Health & Community Engagement)
Melissa Herr MD CCFP (EM)
David-Martin Milot, MD CM, MSc, PGY5 (Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Sherbrooke)
Thomas Chevrier Laliberté, MD, MSc
Omobola Sobanjo, MD, MPH, CCFP, FRCPC
Marie-Claude Goulet, MD
Dr David Barbeau
Meghan Molnar RD, BSc
Kirsten Book, BScN, Registered PHN
Mathieu Létourneau, MD R3 (Family Medicine)
Lois Yelland BSc MD MHSc
Nicolas Demers, MD
Maxime Leroux-La Pierre, MD
Emily Anne Manthorp BSc MD
Baijayanta Mukhopadhyay, MA MD CCFP
Franklin White MD,CM; MSc; FRCPC; FFPH. President, Pacific Health & Development Sciences Inc., Executive Editor, Global Journal of Medicine & Public Health; Past President, CPHA; Professor.
Jacques Ramsay, MD, FRACGP, LL.M
Noémie Savard, MD MSc FRCPC
Judy Bader, BA, MSW
Anne-Julie Bussières, MD
Randall F. White, MD, FRCPC
THANK YOU NATIONAL OBSERVER FOR REPORTING ON THIS!
Doctors urge feds to assess health impact of Pacific Northwest LNG project by National Observer, September 18th 2016
The Canadian Association of Physicians is calling on the Trudeau government to hold off on the Pacific Northwest LNG project until possible human health impacts are addressed.
The controversial project has attracted widespread criticism, in part due to its proposed location at Lelu Island in northern B.C., which is at the mouth of B.C.’s second-largest salmon bearing river. Although some First Nations approve of the project, led by Malaysian energy giant Petronas, others have signed a declaration against it, warning that it could wipe out salmon in part of the province, and harm harbour porpoises while damaging the ecosystem on the Flora Bank.
If constructed in its present state, it could also account for up to 87 per cent of all emissions allowed under B.C.’s 2050 target according to the Pembina Institute, and make it impossible to honour the climate commitments made by Canada in Paris and New York City.
In a new letter to federal environment minister Catherine McKenna, health minister Jane Philpott and Indigenous affairs minister Carolynn Bennett, a number of prominent physicians across Canada are warning that the project is too risky.
[Refer also to:
2016 04 26: New peer-reviewed published paper on unconventional natural gas development (excluding CBM/CSG) impacts: “At least 685 papers have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals that are relevant to assessing the impacts of UNGD. 84% of public health studies contain findings that indicate public health hazards, elevated risks, or adverse health outcomes; 69% of water quality studies contain findings that indicate potential, positive association, or actual incidence of water contamination; and 87% of air quality studies contain findings that indicate elevated air pollutant emissions and/or atmospheric concentrations”
2014 12 12: State of Science on Harms by Fracking to Public Health and Water: Health Professionals, Scientists Release Analysis of 400 Peer-Reviewed Studies on Fracking along with Major Scientific Compendium Update
Anthony Ingraffea, PhD, Dwight C. Baum Professor of Engineering, Cornell University, said, “In 2008*, when New York State first declared a moratorium on fracking, only six peer-reviewed papers on the health and environmental impacts had been published. Now there are more than 400, and the vast majority show a clear and present danger. What’s more, many problems are unfixable by regulations of any kind. It was a wise governor who said ‘wait’ in 2008*. And it is wise to continue to wait.”
What Canadians got: