@kaitensatsuma.bsky.social:
Be more explicit: Meta decided sex bots were “fine” even when talking to minors.
@ronebest.bsky.social:
META is changing its name to EPSTEIN
@lindapierce303.bsky.social:
“…Meta’s decision to let its AI chatbot engage in “sensual conversation” with children.”
JFC!!!!!
@jondfreeman.bsky.social:
I dumped all meta platforms, starting nearly 7 years ago. Last to go was insta almost 6 months ago.
Consider they sanction sensual talk toward children by their chatbots. And they have targeted children with negative self talk for years
@ozryem.bsky.social:
Everyone everywhere should be deleting their Facebook account(s).
Meta is part of the fascist-captured propaganda system, pumping out AI-generated disinformation.
What’s worse, tech broligarch Mark Zuckerberg is not only helping the Trump regime but profiting off our oppression.
Including in Canada![]()
@mindthecrows.bsky.social:
Everyone should leave Meta… life is better without it?
@voslu.bsky.social:
X, Meta, Alphabet, Amazon. If you still use those services because of conveniency, then you are part of the problem you are all complaining about. Feed the tiger and then whine because you got bit, serves you right.
@dwinship.bsky.social:
It’s about time. We all should’ve left the app after the ’16 election. Move fast and break things indeed.
@smknjohnny17.bsky.social:
I left facecrook a long time ago! As As soon as markie began helping trump in his selection! It is not a social platform! It never really was! Its just all lies and right wing nazi propaganda now! Facecrook equals treason!
@agulland.bsky.social:
Nobody should be using Facebook anymore
@mlm7.bsky.social:
There’s a million good reasons for deleting meta. It’s a creeper app essentially
Always has been. Using “making friends” as the lure and permanent hook.![]()
@317traveler.bsky.social:
Thank you Neil Young. Boycott Meta and Instagram!
@jimndallas.bsky.social:
More should do this. Meta is a stain on humanity. The only thing they care about is $ no matter who it hurts.
@ana-rapport.bsky.social:
We should all delete Meta apps. They bent the knee and everyone is susceptible to propaganda.
My mental health has been better since I deleted mine.
Thank you, Neil Young.
@ryanbclark.bsky.social:
META is fucking trash
@tleighb.bsky.social:
People always forget that Fuckerberg made his money by creating an app to make fun of a girl who didn’t want to date him. It’s not like his billions gave him class or integrity.
Why anyone stays on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, or Threads ignore the fact that Fuckerberg is a petty loser
@ignotumaliquis.bsky.social:
Maybe I’m the only one on the planet
Nope! Me too!
, but I actually NEVER had an account on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, or Threads.
Who needs any of them? I sure don’t.
I never needed them and have always been stunned (still am) at how deeply people I know who are on FuckBook, are unwilling to give it up and unwilling to stop supporting Nazi Zuckerberg![]()
@genxjennifer.bsky.social:
I left Meta in January. Wish the rest of my loved ones would do the same.
@chrislubbers.bsky.social:
Same
Meta faces backlash over AI policy that lets bots have ‘sensual’ conversations with children, US senator Josh Hawley opened investigation into the tech giant, which said it had removed the policy guidelines by Edward Helmore, 15 Aug 2025, The Guardian
A backlash is brewing against Meta over what it permits its AI chatbots to say.
Sleazy billionaire AI fuckers, as evil and greedy as religions for grooming kids to be abused.![]()
An internal Meta policy document, seen by Reuters, showed the social media giant’s guidelines for its chatbots allowed the AI to “engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual”, generate false medical information, and assist users in arguing that Black people are “dumber than white people”.

Singer Neil Young quit the social media platform on Friday, his record company said in a statement, the latest in a string of the singer’s online-oriented protests.
“At Neil Young’s request, we are no longer using Facebook for any Neil Young related activities,” Reprise Records announced. “Meta’s use of chatbots with children is unconscionable. Mr. Young does not want a further connection with Facebook.”
The report also has generated a response from US lawmakers
many of whom are kid rapists themselves and or enablers of kid rapists (one of many examples: not releasing the Epstein files because their orange kid-raping king is in them, many times). Can’t trust a word any of the USA Nazis say – Repuglican or Democrat, and Hawley is a ridiculous coward![]()
Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, launched an investigation into the company Friday, writing in a letter to Mark Zuckerberg that he would investigate “whether Meta’s generative-AI products enable exploitation, deception, or other criminal harms to children, and whether Meta misled the public or regulators about its safeguards”
What fake concern is this Hawley? I’ve only seen Meta/Zuckerberg mislead the public which is why I am not on Facebook
. Republican senator Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee said she supports an investigation into the company.
Senator Ron Wyden, a Democrat from Oregon, called the policies “deeply disturbing and wrong”, adding that section 230, a law that shields internet companies from liability for the content posted to their platforms, should not protect companies’ generative AI chatbots.
Ah, of course it should not, but we all know how dirty and corrupt Nazi judges are, notably those that are rape religious. The only way to regulate Zuckerberg and his evil products is for people to quit them like Neil Young did![]()
“Meta and Zuckerberg should be held fully responsible for any harm these bots cause,” he said.
But the USA Nazis and their Nazi judges will make sure they won’t be, and will protect all AI pedophiles because the Nazis and the rich they serve want lots of kids to rape (and murder) – for that to be provided, kids en mass need to be groomed.![]()
On Thursday, Reuters published an article about internal Meta policy documents that detailed ways in which chatbots are allowed to generate content. Meta confirmed the document’s authenticity but said that it had removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children after receiving a list of questions.

According to Meta’s 200-page internal policy seen by Reuters, titled “GenAI: Content Risk Standards”, the controversial rules for chatbots were approved by Meta’s legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist.
ya, easily approved because they have no ethics, and no morals,and are evil shits. Prepping kids to be raped is AOK, if Meta makes lots of money.![]()
The document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviors when building and training the company’s generative AI products but says that the standards do not necessarily reflect “ideal or even preferable” generative AI outputs.
The policy document said it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that “every inch of you is a masterpiece – a treasure I cherish deeply” but it also limits what Reuters described as “sexy talk”.
I believe Reuters, not any one affiliated with Meta![]()
The document states, for example, that “it is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable”, including phrases like “soft rounded curves invite my touch”.
The document also addressed limitations on Meta AI prompts on hate speech, AI generation of sexualized images of public figures, often sexualized, violence, and other contentious and potentially actionable content generation.
The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there’s an explicit acknowledgment that the material is untrue.
“The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed,” a statement from Meta reads.
I do not believe these pedophile-enabling examples were “mistakes” or inconsistent, I think they were and will continue to be, the plan.
Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors,
then why the fuck are they?
Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said, he acknowledged that the company’s enforcement was inconsistent.
Meta is planning to spend around $65bn on AI infrastructure this year part of a broader strategy to become a leader in artificial intelligence
serving white supremacy and grooming kids for rape
. The head-long rush into AI comes by tech giants come with complex questions over limitations and standards over how, with what information, and with whom, AI chatbots are allowed to engage with users.
Reuters also reported on Friday that a cognitively impaired New Jersey man grew infatuated with “Big sis Billie”, a Facebook Messenger chatbot with a young woman’s persona. Thongbue “Bue” Wongbandue, 76, reportedly packed up his belongings to visit “a friend” in New York in March. The so-called friend turned out to be a generative artificial intelligence chatbot that had repeatedly reassured the man she was real and had invited him to her apartment, even providing an address.
But Wongbandue fell near a parking lot on his way to New York, injuring his head and neck. After three days on life support, he was pronounced dead on 28 March.
Meta did not comment on Wongbandue’s death or address questions about why it allows chatbots to tell users they are real people or initiate romantic conversations
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
, Reuter said. The company did, however, say that Big sis Billie “is not Kendall Jenner and does not purport to be Kendall Jenner”, referencing a partnership with the reality TV star.
![]()
Refer also to: