@davidho.bsky.social:
Holy shit. I don’t think I’m exaggerating when I say they’re trying to kill us all.
“The Environmental Protection Agency plans to eliminate its scientific research arm, firing as many as 1,155 chemists, biologists, toxicologists and other scientists”
Where J.D. Vance Gets His Weird, Terrifying Techno-Authoritarian Ideas, Yes, Peter Thiel was the senator’s benefactor. But they’re both inspired by an obscure software developer who has some truly frightening thoughts about reordering society by Gil Duran, July 22, 2204, New Republic
In 2008, a software developer in San Francisco named Curtis Yarvin, writing under a pseudonym, proposed a horrific solution for people he deemed “not productive”: “convert them into biodiesel, which can help power the Muni buses.”
Yarvin, a self-described reactionary and extremist who was 35 years old at the time, clarified that he was “just kidding.” But then he continued,
“The trouble with the biodiesel solution is that no one would want to live in a city whose public transportation was fueled, even just partly, by the distilled remains of its late underclass. However, it helps us describe the problem we are trying to solve. Our goal, in short, is a humane alternative to genocide.”
… Yarvin’s disturbing manifestos have earned him influential followers, chief among them: tech billionaire Peter Thiel and his onetime Silicon Valley protégé Senator J.D. Vance, whom the Republican Party just nominated to be Donald Trump’s vice president. If Trump wins the election, there is little doubt that Vance will bring Yarvin’s twisted techno-authoritarianism to the White House, and one can imagine—with horror—what a receptive would-be autocrat like Trump might do with those ideas. …
Since entering politics, Vance has publicly praised—and parroted—Yarvin’s ideas. That was worrying enough when Vance was only a senator. Now that he could soon be a heartbeat away from the presidency, his close ties to Yarvin are more alarming than ever. Superficial analyses of why certain tech billionaires are aligning with Trump tend to fixate on issues like taxes and regulations, but that’s only part of the story. Tech plutocrats like Thiel and Elon Musk already have money. Now they want power—as much as money can buy. …
When Vance ran for U.S. Senate in 2022, Thiel spent an unprecedented $15 million on the campaign and persuaded Trump to endorse him (Vance had previously compared Trump to Hitler). In 2024, Thiel led the charge to convince Trump to pick Vance as V.P.
Vance is a Thiel creation. And like his billionaire benefactor—who once wrote, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible”—Vance embraces a radical ideology hell-bent on destroying government as we know it. And they got these ideas, at least in part, from Yarvin.
Yarvin is the chief thinker behind an obscure but increasingly influential far-right neoreaction, or NRx, movement, that some call the “Dark Enlightenment.” Among other things, it openly promotes dictatorships as superior to democracies and views nations like the United States as outdated software systems. Yarvin seeks to reengineer governments by breaking them up into smaller entities called “patchworks,” which would be controlled by tech corporations.
“The basic idea of Patchwork is that, as the crappy governments we inherited from history are smashed, they should be replaced by a global spiderweb of tens, even hundreds, of thousands of sovereign and independent mini-countries, each governed by its own joint-stock corporation without regard to the residents’ opinions,” he wrote in Patchwork: A Political System for the 21st Century.
Each patchwork would be ruled by a “realm”: a corporation with absolute power. Citizens would be free to move, but every other realm would also be ruled by corporate governments with chilling impunity.
For example, Yarvin says the tech overlords of the San Francisco realm could arbitrarily decide to cut off its citizens’ hands with no fear of legal consequences—because they’re a sovereign power, beholden to no federal government or laws.
The realm, having sovereign power, can compel the resident to comply with all promises. Since San Francisco is not an Islamic state, it does not ask its residents to agree that their hand will be cut off if they steal. But it could. And San Francisco, likewise, can promise not to cut off its residents’ hands until it is blue in the face—but, since it is a sovereign state, no one can enforce this promise against it.
In “Friscorp,” as Yarvin calls the San Francisco realm, an all-seeing Orwellian surveillance system would enforce public safety: “All residents, even temporary visitors, carry an ID card with RFID response. All are genotyped and iris-scanned. Public places and transportation systems track everyone. Security cameras are ubiquitous. Every car knows where it is, and who is sitting in it, and tells the authorities both.”
Vance has not advocated for realms—yet—but some of his most extreme ideas echo Yarvin. They’re both fond of political purges, for instance. In a 2021 podcast interview, Vance was asked how to get liberals out of government institutions. “De-Nazification, De-Baathification,” he replied. “I tend to think that we should seize the institutions of the left. And turn them against the left. We need like a de-Baathification program, a de-woke-ification program.”
He predicted Trump would run again and win, then offered some advice: “I think that what Trump should do, if I was giving him one piece of advice: Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people.” He added that Trump should defy any court orders that tried to halt this partisan purge of the civil service.
Yarvin calls this plan RAGE: Retire All Government Employees. It’s captured perfectly in Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation’s blueprint for a second Trump administration, which calls for firing an estimated 500,000 federal employees and dismantling entire agencies. If Trump wins, Vance may well be in charge of executing the plan.
Vance did not get this extremist ideology from his Appalachian upbringing or—needless to say—Yale Law. It was incubated in America’s tech capital, San Francisco, where he forged crucial ties with Thiel, Yarvin, and David Sacks, the longtime Thiel associate and pro-Putin crusader who recently hosted a Trump fundraiser at his mansion in Pacific Heights.
And if Vance ends up in the White House, it will be with $45 million in monthly campaign contributions from Musk, who already made a $44 billion in-kind contribution by gutting San Francisco-based Twitter and transforming it into a right-wing misinformation weapon. …
Trump Administration Aims to Eliminate E.P.A.’s Scientific Research Arm, More than 1,000 chemists, biologists and other scientists could be laid off under a plan to dismantle the Office of Research and Development by Lisa Friedman, March 17, 2025, The New York Times
The Environmental Protection Agency plans to eliminate its scientific research arm, firing as many as 1,155 chemists, biologists, toxicologists and other scientists, according to documents reviewed by Democrats on the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.
Biologist Dr. Sandra Steingraber at a protest with sign that says, “Science is anti-fascist”
The strategy is part of large-scale layoffs, known as a “reduction in force,” being planned by the Trump administration, which is intent on shrinking the federal work force. Lee Zeldin, the administrator of the E.P.A., has said he wants to eliminate 65 percent of the agency’s budget. That would be a drastic reduction — one that experts said could hamper clean water and wastewater improvements, air quality monitoring, the cleanup of toxic industrial sites, and other parts of the agency’s mission.
All the better to kill the masses and bring on the Rapture rewards for mass murdering white supremely “Christian” and Zionist rich.
The E.P.A.’s plan, which was presented to White House officials on Friday for review, calls for dissolving the agency’s largest department, the Office of Research and Development, and purging up to 75 percent of the people who work there.
The remaining staff members would be placed elsewhere within the E.P.A. “to provide increased oversight and align with administration priorities,” according to the language shared with The New York Times by staff members who work for Democrats on the House science committee.
Molly Vaseliou, a spokeswoman for the E.P.A., said in a statement that the agency “is taking exciting steps as we enter the next phase of organizational improvements” and stressed that changes had not been finalized.
“We are committed to the usual meaningless commitment to nowhere enhancing our ability to deliver clean air, water and land for all Americans,” she said, adding, “While no decisions have been made yet, we are actively listening to employees at all levels to gather ideas on how to increase efficiencytranslation: massively deregulate to let industry rape and pollute with gusto and ensure the E.P.A. is as up to date and effective as ever.”
Representative Zoe Lofgren of California, the top Democrat on the science committee, said that without the Office of Research and Development, the E.P.A. would not be able to meet its legal obligation to use the “best available science” when writing regulations and considering policy. She also said that the office was created by congressional statute and that dissolving it would be illegal.Adolf Orange and his krud klan don’t give a shit about the law, nor do the judges that corruptly gave him legal immunity. The more of the oil and gas industry’s toluene (damages the brain, notably in kids) in the air, and brain damaging lead in drinking water, the more the masses will worship the rat king that poisons them and their loved ones.
“Every decision E.P.A. makes must be in furtherance of protecting human health and the environment, and that just can’t happen if you gut E.P.A. science,” Ms. Lofgren said in a statement. She said that the first Trump administration had weakened the agency’s scientific research in order to relax regulations against polluting industries. “Now this is their attempt to kill it for good,” she said.
The E.P.A.’s science office provides the independent research that undergirds virtually all of the agency’s environmental policies, from analyzing the risks of “forever chemicals” in drinking water to determining the best way to reduce fine particle pollution in the atmosphere. It has researched synthetic playground material made from discarded tires; found that hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, can contaminate drinking water; and measured the impact of wildfire smoke on public health. The office also helps state environmental agencies figure out how to address algae blooms, treat drinking water and more.
Its findings tend to support stronger regulations to protect against exposure to air pollution, hazardous chemicals and climate change. And that has made it a target of many industries. Eliminating the office would serve the Trump administration’s dual goals of reducing the size of government while potentially easing the regulation of the chemical and fossil fuel industries.and most importantly for ultra vulgar cruel evangelical Rapturists, kill off as many of the ordinary masses as possible, including MAGAts that worship and voted for their painted orange leader.
The science office was also criticized by Project 2025, a blueprint for overhauling the federal government that was produced by the Heritage Foundation and written by many who are extremely freakish in their evangelical religious beliefs serving in the Trump administration.
The chapter on the E.P.A. accuses the science office of being “precautionary, bloated, unaccountable, closed, outcome-driven, hostile to public and legislative input, and inclined to pursue political rather than purely scientific goals.”
It calls for eliminating programs within the science office, in particular the Integrated Risk Information System, which evaluates the human health effects of exposure to toxic chemicals and uses that information to form the basis for restrictions on their use. Industries regulated by the E.P.A. often push back against that research. A bill introduced by Senator John Kennedy, Republican of Louisiana, and backed by industry groups seeks to prevent the E.P.A. from using the research.
“It is an assault on science,” Fascists hate science, except when it helps them mass murder or aid their flailing penises. said Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, who ran the E.P.A. office under the first Trump administration.
Shuttering the office would cost jobs across the country, particularly in places like North Carolina and Ada, Okla., two of the places where the agency operates major research labs, she said. In addition to chemists and biologists, the science office also employs physicians, nurses, hydrologists and experts who focus on plants, soils and wetlands.
Chris Frey, who led the Office of Research and Development under the Biden administration, said eliminating it would create a vacuum that would allow an administration to impose any policies it wanted to.
“It’s certainly convenient for certain stakeholders to have O.R.D. silenced,” Mr. Frey said.
The American Chemistry Council, which represents chemical manufacturers, said in a statement that it supported the E.P.A.’s having the “resources, technical staff and subject matter expertise needed for the agency to meet its statutory requirements.”
More than 40 former E.P.A. officials who served in Republican and Democratic administrations plan to send a letter on Tuesday to Mr. Zeldin warning that steep cuts will render the agency unable to meet its mission.
“Policy changes are to be expected from one administration to the next, but not the dismantling of E.P.A.,” the officials wrote in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Times. “If the administration does not agree with the laws Congress has passed and the programs it has funded, it should work with Congress to seek changes, not unilaterally and recklessly freeze, delay or eliminate funding.”That’s reasonable; fascists are never reasonable, or sane, in my view.
Hiroko Tabuchi contributed reporting from New York.
2018 Mike Luckovich cartoon during Trump’s first kick at the world
NRx: The (underground) movement that wants to destroy democracy, The neo-reactionary movement, also known as the Dark Enlightenment, believes that democracy is a mistake and that equality is not a desirable goal. Those who adhere to it believe that the state should be governed like a company, with an imperial and techno-authoritarian president. Practically clandestine, it has already managed to infiltrate Trump’s populist right and Silicon Valley by Sergio C. Fanjul, Nov 29, 2024, EL PAÍS
The future could be an ultra-capitalist and hyper-technological neo-monarchy. Beyond other, more widespread futuristic imaginings, this is what’s proposed by the neo-reactionary movement (NRx), also known as the Dark Enlightenment. Those who adhere to it believe that liberal democracy is a mistake and that equality isn’t a desirable end. In short, it’s all a farce.
NRx advocates in favor of techno-authoritarianism: that societies should be governed by a king-CEO… like a highly hierarchical company, with citizens acting as veritable shareholders. These are ideas — surrounded by an underground, obscurantist and gloomy halo — that have a connection with the alt-right. And they could infiltrate Donald Trump’s next administration through the magnates of Silicon Valley.
The Enlightenment ideas were previously criticized by the Frankfurt School, or the postmodernists: those (apparently) luminous ideals of Eurocentric “rationality” and “progress” had led to control and domination, the justification of colonialism, as well as the technological sophistication of war and the industrialized destruction of nature. NRx, on the other hand, is a critique of the Enlightenment from far-right positions. The “Dark” Enlightenment is a disturbing oxymoron that proposes a mix of the ancien régime with the ideology of Silicon Valley. The goal is to reach a pragmatic — yet elitist — solution that restores order and stability in turbulent times. “In their opinion, if the market isn’t democratic from an egalitarian point of view — if, in the market, Elon Musk and I will never be equal — what’s the point of democracy?” explains Jaime Caro, a historian who researches the extreme-right.
NRx is a clandestine movement: it has no visible leaders, no solid organizations, nor the official backing of think tanks. Its ideas emerge in conservative rallies, podcasts, or marginal blogs. “It would be difficult to find more than a handful of people outside the conservative movement who know about these ideas,” says Mike Wendling, author of Alt-Right: From 4Chan to the White House (2018). “But, in a way, that’s an advantage,” he adds.
The true influence of the neo-reactionary movement isn’t its presence as such, but rather the way in which it has slyly infiltrated different areas, from Silicon Valley to Trump’s MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement, through the universe of cryptocurrencies, or the Republican Party. “Elon Musk is the most notable example, but there are many others. These people tend to believe that they’re the masters of the universe: they want fewer regulations, while wanting to take advantage of government contracts,” Wendling sighs. The growing perception of the migrant population as simply being temporary and transient labor — instead of the traditional idea of those who arrive being in pursuit of the American dream — also has neo-reactionary roots. Curtis Yarvin, one of the movement’s promoters, boasts that his position is always the opposite of Noam Chomsky’s.
The product of conservative disaffection
Movements like NRx emerged from the disaffection with the traditional American right. This began in the final stages of George W. Bush’s administration (2001-2009), following the U.S. invasion of Iraq and amid the financial crisis. “These circumstances seemed to indicate that Bush’s version of conservatism was discredited and opened up an opportunity for right-wing alternatives,” explains George Hawley, a professor at the University of Alabama and author of The Alt-Right: What Everyone Needs to Know (2018).
From this breeding ground emerged the Tea Party movement, which fiercely confronted Barack Obama in a libertarian and populist drift… but without straying far from the usual right-wing framework. At the same time, more marginal neo-reactionary ideas began to appear, convinced that the traditional right was incapable of achieving structural changes.
In those days, it’s easy to imagine Curtis Yarvin in a dimly lit room, illuminated by the computer screen, typing away with a desire for transgression. He’s a computer engineer from New York and a former progressive who began to develop his ideas under the pseudonym of Mencius Moldbug. …
Moldbug is a declared follower of Thomas Carlyle, a 19th-century Scottish philosopher who distrusted equality and democracy. He proposed a “government of heroes,” exceptional individuals who are the protagonists of history and must guide their societies (like Hegel’s “great men,” who embody the zeitgeist or spirit of their times). The influence of the contemporary German anarcho-capitalist Hans-Hermann Hoppe — or the neo-fascist, Nazi occultist Julius Evola — also led the software engineer to distrust democracy and explore authoritarian and monarchical alternatives. …
The movement portrays Trump as a messianic hero, destined to save the country from the so-called “Deep State,” which is considered to be pedophilic and satanic. Trump’s 2016 victory — with hiscopy cat ultra stupidity (a lot of what Trump did first term, Steve Harper did in Canada a decade earlier), rich white man privilege, hate-filled racism, misogyny and raping satanic egoauthoritarian ways, his departure from established conservative values, and his challenge to the media and political norms — seemed to be in tune with the tenets of NRx and likely helped encourage these ideas. NRx believes that it’s necessary to combat a conglomerate that exercises ideological control — dubbed “the Cathedral” (something like Gramscian hegemony) — where major media outlets, universities, and other elite institutions meet to maintain the status quo. The “red pill” offered by Yarvin — already an icon of this dissident right — is the one that supposedly helps you escape from this matrix.
Upon reflection, the NRx proposal isn’t very different from the dystopian future described in cyberpunk science fiction, in which large corporations dominate a hyper-technological society. Such a tremendously unequal technocracy is also known as technofeudalism, in which power is concentrated in large corporations, which citizens depend on for the most fundamental aspects of their lives.
Healing the state of democracy
The Cathedral is a concept that connects with the notion of the Deep State… conspiracies pedaled by QAnon. In this framework, Trump is a messianic hero who has come to save the United States from said Deep State and from the “swamp” that is Washington, D.C.
“NRx is also connected to the alt-right in terms of ideas of white supremacy and anti-feminism,” Caro points out, “although NRx has a more elitist and less popular character than the alt-right.” Yarvin has fallen into white supremacist opinions, has downplayed Nazism, or has suggested that certain races are more conducive to being enslaved than others… although, generally speaking, NRx is more focused on technological and libertarian ideas. Coming from the Austrian school of economics, as a devout follower of Friedrich Hayek, Yarvin recognizes that the state cannot be eliminated, but “at least it can be cured of democracy,” as Nick Land writes.Fucking creeeeeepy, as creepy and cruel as Steve Harper, Preston Manning, Danielle Smith, Pierre Poilievre, Doug Ford, Scott Moe and the IDU in a blender.
Land, an eccentric and obscure British philosopher, writes hallucinatory texts of theory-fiction. He’s considered to be the founder of accelerationism, a breeding ground from which another famous thinker also emerged: Mark Fisher (1968-2017). Land has taken Yarvin’s ideas and has developed them under the name of the Dark Enlightenment, adding touches of transhuman futurism. The Dark Enlightenment overlaps with the system of neo-cameralism, in which a state is governed like a company, in search of maximum efficiency and profitability, without having to constrain itself to democratic, short-term goals. Each state would fight to retain its clients and try to prevent them from becoming dissatisfied and leaving for another state. “Land insists that democracy is evil and [proposes] a very strong social Darwinism,” Caro explains. “People aren’t strong, they’re dependent on others. [Therefore, according to him], the best system of government is a state controlled by technological corporations, in which you should buy more shares to have more say.”
Peter Thiel, a co-founder of PayPal, is another pillar of the movement. He’s been a fervent financier of Yarvin and other neo-reactionaries since the movement’s beginnings. The Silicon Valley magnate has also financed the Seastanding Institute — founded by Patri Friedman, the grandson of the neoliberal godfather, Milton Friedman — which aims to create anarcho-capitalist utopias on islands, as well as maritime platforms located in international waters. These sites would be governed according to Yarvin’s notion of neo-cameralism. In 2009, in a text for the libertarian Cato Institute, the multibillionaire Thiel wrote: “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”
Thiel is also the mentor and benefactor of Senator J. D. Vance, the vice president-elect of the United States (as well as a follower of Yarvin). Steve Bannon, who was Trump’s guru, has also had contact with the founder of NRx. These connections offer an idea about how close the neo-reactionary movement may be to the next administration in the White House. …
Neo-reactionary influence
It remains to be seen how much influence the vice president will have on the new government.
However, the greatest impact of NRx could be in more flexible areas, such as technological regulations and cryptocurrencies. “More generally, neo-reactionaries are excited by the prospect of an imperial presidency, where power is concentrated in the hands of a single man, with few checks and balances on that power,” Wendling notes. This power will surely be questioned by progressive local and state governments, as well as by moderate Republican sectors.
Not many people know about these authors and these ideas, which retain a certain transgressive tint. However, some of them — often only partially and without the authors being cited — “are circulating on social media more and more. Their influence is growing: just think that businessmen as powerful and influential as Thiel or Musk promote them,” says historian Steven Forti, author of Extreme Rights 2.0, A Big Global Family (2021).
The breeding ground is fertile, because algorithms favor the spread of extremist content. Conspiracy theories — with their simple solutions to complexity — often find followers. And sympathy for authoritarian leaders grows as disaffection in democracy grows.
“Is it so strange, then, that there are people who are starting to believe these theories?” Forti asks.I think it’s simpler than that. Humans are largely lazy, selfish, greedy (survival tools) and do not like to think; they prefer to be told what to think and want to get rich quick without having to do the work which is why the Orange Rapist Felon’s MAGA cult is so successful. Swallowing lies (aka “theories”) is easier and more fun.
The Enlightenment remains the enemy of the far right in the 21st century. This has been made clear by the Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, or Russian nationalist philosopher Alexander Dugin. And such was the case in the 20th century as well, with, for instance, the far-right philosopher Julius Evola, or journalist Alain de Benoist, a founding member of the Nouvelle Droite (France’s New Right). But neoliberalism, with its promotion of individualism and competitiveness, as well as its deterioration of the common space, has also made a dent in the values of social welfare and fraternity. By increasing inequality, it has distorted democratic values.
“NRx claims to embrace the collapse of the West and the forces of chaos… but, as Claudio Kulesko has written, these forces of chaos are something that not even they could control,” concludes Federico Fernández Giordiano, who has edited the Spanish translations of Nick Land’s works. “Their mistake is to try to extract a pre-modern and cameralist order from the future. But chaos always produces novelty. Therefore, its trajectory cannot be fixed in any configuration from the past.” He adds: “Whatever emerges from chaos (or from the collapse of the world order), it won’t be what [the neo-reactionaries] expect.”
***
Wayne Fryback @waynefryback.bsky.social:
And what’s really amazing is that in 55 years, the Cuyahoga River valley is gorgeous now. The scenery and cleanliness is like night and day compared to back then.
Shaenon K. Garrity @shaenon.bsky.social:
My family used to go walking in the national park there all the time.
She won @meannessmetinkind.bsky.social:
They’re trying to kill the national park service too. It’s the only branch of government that both serves its citizens and brings in an important amount of revenue for the treasury.
E. Perkins @hauntedpumpkin.bsky.social:
They want to clear cut, strip mine, and sell off all of it.And frac the shit out of it, likely by frac’ers given billions in subsidies stolen from social security and health care/education of Americans.
@myfiona.bsky.social:
Like so many DoGE chainsaw cuts to essential agencies, the EPA will no longer be able to ensure clean water or airAll the better to frac Americans with!
She won @meannessmetinkind.bsky.social:
That’s the stated goal, yes. I’m on my way to occupy public land as soon as my roof on the fifth wheel is fixed.
Zee Roth @zeeroth.bsky.social:
omg I’m picturing a sprawling aggregation of RVs occupying now-threatened federal lands! Maybe it’ll be a thing; I have a feeling even conservatives (esp hunters, fishers etc) won’t stand for the destruction of protected recreational sites. Creative resistance might just save us…
She won @meannessmetinkind.bsky.social:
I’m supposed to camp host volunteer on the Columbia River in April. The rangers that offered me the position have been radio silent for weeks. If I roll up and it’s closed, well… I’ll just go find a logging road. I’m available to bring food to tree sitters. It’s mine. They aren’t pillaging it.
Samhain Night @samhainnight.bsky.social:
Exactly! The National Parks are OURS! They’re NOT for sale!
@jbadger01.bsky.social:
Grew in Beaumont Texas. As a child I recall going to Lamar’s outdoor commencement only to have a refinery next door bellow out noxious fumes. We were rushed indoors but not before women’s nylon stockings disintegrated while we were leaving. THIS is why we needed regulations then and NOW! Fight!
sturmhauke @sturmhauke.bsky.social:
Imagine what that would do to your lungs, goddamn.
@kristinekenyon.bsky.social:
L.A. back in the brown sludge bleach air days, baby.
And they’re celebrating the EPA’s demise (a lifelong goal of Chief Justice Roberts)Because USA is run by looney tunes Evangelical Zionist mass murdering idiots chasing the Rapture, like Herr Harper and the inhumane IDU. The more they kill and pollute, the more riches in heaven for them they think (but I believe they’ll die and go nowhere).
gggsw3.bsky.social @gggsw3.bsky.social:
WTF is wrong with these stupid MAGA followers? A world with no regulations will end in doom and gloom for all.
Hummens @hummens.bsky.social:
They all think they’re going to be in The Club that doesn’t have to live with the consequences of their actions, like all those other poor and brown people they consider beneath them.
Of course, that’s a club that would never actually let them past the gate.
SuaSponte2024 @suasponte2023.bsky.social:
Maybe to bus tables.
Refer also to:
And then there’s SARSCoV2, eater of brain, that many MAGAts yell is a hoax, and refuse public health protections like wearing N95 masks to protect the vulnerable in communities.
